ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2019
High-resolution colonic manometry and its clinical application in patients with colonic dysmotility: A review.
Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thirty years of paediatric colonic motility assessment modalities: a systematic review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Beyond the Intestinal Mucosa in Long-Standing Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Consequences of Chronic Inflammation and Endoscopic Approaches to Diagnosis and Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Exploring Diagnostic Priorities: The Role of Colonic Manometry in Evaluating Pediatric Patients with Intractable Idiopathic Constipation Prior to Sacral Nerve Stimulation.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Idiopathic Slow Transit Constipation: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- A Flexible Implant for Multi-Day Monitoring of Colon Segment Activity.IEEE transactions on biomedical circuits and systems · 2023Article
- A descriptive study of high resolution total colonic intracavitary manometry and colonic transit test in the diagnostic efficacy of functional constipation in Chinese patients.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Bowel transit studies in children: evidence base, role and practicalities.Frontline gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Luminal Fluid Motion Inside an In Vitro Dissolution Model of the Human Ascending Colon Assessed Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The detailed process and mechanism of colonic motility are still unclear, and colonic motility disorders are associated with numerous clinical diseases. Colonic manometry is considered to the most direct means of evaluating colonic peristalsis. Colonic manometry has been studied for more than 30 years; however, the long duration of the examination, high risk of catheterization, huge amount of real-time data, strict catheter sterilization, and high cost of disposable equipment restrict its wide application in clinical practice. Recently, high-resolution colonic manometry (HRCM) has rapidly developed into a major technique for obtaining more effective information involved in the physiology and/or pathophysiology of colonic contractile activity in colonic dysmotility patients. This review focuses on colonic motility, manometry, operation, and motor patterns, and the clinical application of HRCM. Furthermore, the limitations, future directions, and potential usefulness of HRCM in the evaluation of clinical treatment effects are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.