Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31616044›Full record

ReviewThe pharmacogenomics journal2020

Pharmacogenomics, biomarker network, and allele frequencies in colorectal cancer.

Andrés López-Cortés, César Paz-Y-Miño, Santiago Guerrero, Gabriela Jaramillo-Koupermann, Ángela León Cáceres, Dámaris P Intriago-Baldeón, Jennyfer M García-Cárdenas, Patricia Guevara-Ramírez, Isaac Armendáriz-Castillo, Paola E Leone and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The pharmacogenomics journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Deciphering organotropism reveals therapeutic targets in metastasis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Colon Cancer Pharmacogenetics: A Narrative Review.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Andrés López-CortésCentro de Investigación Genética y Genómica, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Universidad UTE, 170527, Quito, Ecuador. aalc84@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1503-1929
César Paz-Y-MiñoCentro de Investigación Genética y Genómica, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Universidad UTE, 170527, Quito, Ecuador. cesar.pazymino@ute.edu.ec.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6693-7344
Santiago GuerreroCentro de Investigación Genética y Genómica, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Universidad UTE, 170527, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3473-7214
Gabriela Jaramillo-KoupermannLaboratorio de Biología Molecular, Subproceso de Anatomía Patológica, Hospital de Especialidades Eugenio Espejo, 170403, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8068-1763
Ángela León CáceresGlobal Health Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Dámaris P Intriago-BaldeónDivision of Molecular Genome Analysis, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9157-3979
Jennyfer M García-CárdenasCentro de Investigación Genética y Genómica, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Universidad UTE, 170527, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9035-7668
Patricia Guevara-RamírezCentro de Investigación Genética y Genómica, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Universidad UTE, 170527, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4829-3653
Isaac Armendáriz-CastilloCentro de Investigación Genética y Genómica, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Universidad UTE, 170527, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2636-2707
Paola E LeoneCentro de Investigación Genética y Genómica, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Universidad UTE, 170527, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3351-2275
Luis Abel QuiñonesRed Latinoamericana de Implementación y Validación de Guías Clínicas Farmacogenómicas (RELIVAF-CYTED), Santiago, Chile.
Juan Pablo CayúnRed Latinoamericana de Implementación y Validación de Guías Clínicas Farmacogenómicas (RELIVAF-CYTED), Santiago, Chile.
Néstor W SoriaCátedra de Biotecnología, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Católica de Córdoba, Unidad Asociada al CONICET, 5000, Córdoba, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide. Over the last decades, several studies have shown that tumor-related genomic alterations predict tumor prognosis, drug response, and toxicity. These observations have led to the development of several therapies based on individual genomic profiles. As part of these approaches, pharmacogenomics analyses genomic alterations which may predict an efficient therapeutic response. Studying these mutations as biomarkers for predicting drug response is of a great interest to improve precision medicine. We conduct a comprehensive review of the main pharmacogenomics biomarkers and genomic alterations affecting enzyme activity, transporter capacity, channels, and receptors; and therefore the new advances in CRC precision medicine to select the best therapeutic strategy in populations worldwide, with a focus on Latin America.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsGene FrequencyGene Regulatory NetworksHumansPharmacogeneticsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.