Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31616014›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2019

Statin therapy and recurrent venous thromboembolism in the elderly: a prospective cohort study.

Regula Monika Kronenberg, Shanthi Beglinger, Odile Stalder, Marie Méan, Andreas Limacher, Jürg Hans Beer, Drahomir Aujesky, Nicolas Rodondi, Martin Feller

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy of Atorvastatin Against Venous Thromboembolism After Total Hip Arthroplasty.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. COVID-19: Direct and Indirect Mechanisms of Statins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Regula Monika KronenbergDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Shanthi BeglingerDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. shanthi.beglinger@extern.insel.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7965-4466
Odile StalderCTU Bern, and Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Marie MéanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Andreas LimacherCTU Bern, and Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Jürg Hans BeerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of Baden, Baden, Switzerland.
Drahomir AujeskyDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Nicolas RodondiDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Martin FellerDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CHKantonsspital Baden · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies reported lower rates of recurrent venous thromboembolism (rVTE) among statin users, but this association could be influenced by concurrent anticoagulation and confounding by statin indication. This study aimed to confirm the beneficial association between statins and rVTE, stratified according to periods with and without anticoagulation, and additionally employ propensity score weighted approach to reduce risk of confounding by indication. The setting was a prospective multicentre cohort study and the outcome was time to first rVTE in statin vs. non-statin users. 980 participants with acute VTE were enrolled (mean age 75.0 years, 47% women), with median follow-up of 2.5 years. Of 241 (24.3%) statin users, 21 (8.7%) suffered rVTE vs. 99 (13.4%) among 739 non-users. The overall adjusted sub-hazard ratio (aSHR) for rVTE comparing statin users to non-users was 0.72 (95%CI 0.44 to 1.19, p = 0.20). This association was only apparent during periods without anticoagulation (aSHR 0.50, 95%CI 0.27 to 0.92, p = 0.03; vs. with anticoagulation: aSHR 1.34, 95%CI 0.54 to 3.35, p = 0.53). Using propensity scores, the rVTE risk during periods without anticoagulation fell further (aSHR 0.20, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.49, p < 0.001). In conclusion, statin use is associated with a more pronounced risk reduction for rVTE than previously estimated, but only during periods without anticoagulation.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsCase-Control StudiesConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsIncidenceMaleProspective StudiesRecurrenceSecondary PreventionTreatment OutcomeVenous ThromboembolismAnticoagulantsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID31616014
PMCPMC6794319
OpenAlexW2980609426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.