ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019
A
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic islands in Wolbachia prophages drive amplification and diversification of cytoplasmic incompatibility genes in Culex pipiens.Genetics · 2026Article
- Calibrating and documenting host-switching and evolution of incompatibility loci for two closely related Wolbachia clades.Genetics · 2026Article
- Three decades of analyzing Wolbachia bacterial endosymbionts in arthropods: Trends and gaps.Parasitology research · 2026Review
- Wolbachia-induced Cytoplasmic Incompatibility drives epigenetic and maternally-influenced post-embryonic defects.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Article
- Calibrating and documenting host-switching and evolution of incompatibility loci for two closely relatedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Genomic stability and differential expression of type V cif genes inISME communications · 2026Article
- Detection and genetic diversity of Wolbachia and its associated prophage WO in mosquito populations from Ethiopia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deubiquitylases and nucleases in bacterial symbiont-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025Review
- Wolbachia-mediated reproductive manipulation in rice planthoppers.Crop health · 2025Review
- Diversity and spread of cytoplasmic incompatibility genes among maternally inherited symbionts.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Symbiotic Bacteria: Wolbachia, Midgut Microbiota in Mosquitoes and Their Importance for Vector Prevention Strategies.Microbial ecology · 2024Review
- Genomic Underpinnings of Cytoplasmic Incompatibility: CIF Gene-Neighborhood Diversification Through Extensive Lateral Transfers and Recombination in Wolbachia.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Article
- Prophage proteins alter long noncoding RNA and DNA of developing sperm to induce a paternal-effect lethality.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Intra-lineage microevolution of Wolbachia leads to the emergence of new cytoplasmic incompatibility patterns.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Transgenic expression of cif genes from Wolbachia strain wAlbB recapitulates cytoplasmic incompatibility in Aedes aegypti.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Phage WO diversity and evolutionary forces associated withFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Bacterial community and genome analysis of cytoplasmic incompatibility-inducingFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- The cellular lives of Wolbachia.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.