Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31615795›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Study protocol for VIdeo assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy versus conventional Open LobEcTomy for lung cancer, a UK multicentre randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot (the VIOLET study).

Eric Lim, Tim Batchelor, Michael Shackcloth, Joel Dunning, Niall McGonigle, Tim Brush, Lucy Dabner, Rosie Harris, Holly E Mckeon, Sangeetha Paramasivan and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03521375 (VIdeo Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Versus Conventional Open LobEcTomy for Lung Cancer, a Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial With an Internal Pilot), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03521375 nacompletednot on this map

VIdeo Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Versus Conventional Open LobEcTomy for Lung Cancer, a Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial With an Internal Pilot

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BristolRan2015 to 2020Enrolled503ConditionsLung NeoplasmsArmsOpen Surgery, Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Predicthor: AI-Powered Predictive Risk Model for 30-Day Mortality and 30-Day Complications in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery for Lung Cancer.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Ten-year survival outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgeryTranslational lung cancer research · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Eric LimAcademic Division of Thoracic Surgery, The Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS foundation Trust, London, UK e.lim@rbht.nhs.uk.
Tim BatchelorThoracic Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Michael ShackclothDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6494-9907
Joel DunningDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Niall McGonigleDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Royal Brompton and Harefield, Harefield Hospital, London, UK.
Tim BrushClinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Lucy DabnerClinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Rosie HarrisClinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Holly E MckeonClinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Sangeetha ParamasivanPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Daisy ElliottPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Elizabeth A StokesHealth Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4179-1369
Sarah WordsworthHealth Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jane BlazebyPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Chris A RogersClinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
VIOLET Trialists
At Bristol · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBHarefield Hospital · GBJames Cook University Hospital · GBRoyal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationDepartment of Health HTA/13/04/03Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLung cancer is a leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide and surgery remains the main treatment for early stage disease. Prior to the introduction of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), lung resection for cancer was undertaken through an open thoracotomy. To date, the evidence base supporting the different surgical approaches is based on non-randomised studies, small randomised trials and is focused mainly on short-term in-hospital outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The VIdeo assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy versus conventional Open LobEcTomy for lung cancer study is a UK multicentre parallel group randomised controlled trial (RCT) with blinding of outcome assessors and participants (to hospital discharge) comparing the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of VATS lobectomy versus open lobectomy for treatment of lung cancer. We will test the hypothesis that VATS lobectomy is superior to open lobectomy with respect to self-reported physical function 5 weeks after randomisation (approximately 1 month after surgery). Secondary outcomes include assessment of efficacy (hospital stay, pain, proportion and time to uptake of chemotherapy), measures of safety (adverse health events), oncological outcomes (proportion of patients upstaged to pathologic N2 (pN2) disease and disease-free survival), overall survival and health related quality of life to 1 year. The QuinteT Recruitment Intervention is integrated into the trial to optimise recruitment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has been approved by the UK (Dulwich) National Research Ethics Service Committee London. Findings will be written-up as methodology papers for conference presentation, and publication in peer-reviewed journals. Many aspects of the feasibility work will inform surgical RCTs in general and these will be reported at methodology meetings. We will also link with lung cancer clinical studies groups. The patient and public involvement group that works with the Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit at the Brompton Hospital will help identify how we can best publicise the findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13472721.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLondonLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingOperative TimePilot ProjectsPneumonectomyCardiothoracic surgerylobectomylung cancerminimally invasiveopen surgeryrandomised controlled trialvideo assisted

Identifiers

PMID31615795
PMCPMC6797374
OpenAlexW2970157210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.