Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31615693›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2020

Analysis of substance use and its outcomes by machine learning: II. Derivation and prediction of the trajectory of substance use severity.

Ziheng Hu, Yankang Jing, Ying Xue, Peihao Fan, Lirong Wang, Michael Vanyukov, Levent Kirisci, Junmei Wang, Ralph E Tarter, Xiang-Qun Xie

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Role of Despair in Predicting Self-Destructive Behaviors.Population research and policy review · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Leveraging data science to enhance suicide prevention research: a literature review.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ziheng HuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Computational Chemical Genomics Screen Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; NIDA National Center of Excellence for Computational Drug Abuse Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Yankang JingDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Computational Chemical Genomics Screen Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; NIDA National Center of Excellence for Computational Drug Abuse Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ying XueDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Computational Chemical Genomics Screen Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; NIDA National Center of Excellence for Computational Drug Abuse Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Peihao FanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Computational Chemical Genomics Screen Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; NIDA National Center of Excellence for Computational Drug Abuse Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Lirong WangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Computational Chemical Genomics Screen Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; NIDA National Center of Excellence for Computational Drug Abuse Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Michael VanyukovDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Levent KirisciDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Junmei WangNIDA National Center of Excellence for Computational Drug Abuse Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: junmei.wang@pitt.edu.
Ralph E TarterDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: tarter@pitt.edu.
Xiang-Qun XieDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Computational Chemical Genomics Screen Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; NIDA National Center of Excellence for Computational Drug Abuse Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: xix15@pitt.edu.

Funding

TRANSLATION MODULEP50DA005605 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI RIDENOUR, TY A · 1989 to 2014
$25.7M
NIDA Center of Excellence OF Computational Drug Abuse Research (CDAR)P30DA035778 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BAHAR, IVET, XIE, XIANG-QUN · 2014 to 2018
$5.4M
AMBER force field consortium: a coherent biomolecular simulation platformR01GM079383 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CIEPLAK, PIOTR, DUAN, YONG · 2007 to 2017
$4.7M
Protein Design Using Physical Scoring Functions integrated with Site CouplingsR21GM097617 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI WANG, JUNMEI · 2011 to 2012
$397k
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA035778NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA005605NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079383NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM097617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis longitudinal study explored the utility of machine learning (ML) methodology in predicting the trajectory of severity of substance use from childhood to thirty years of age using a set of psychological and health characteristics.

designBoys (N = 494) and girls (N = 206) were recruited using a high-risk paradigm at 10-12 years of age and followed up at 12-14, 16, 19, 22, 25 and 30 years of age. MEASUREMENTS: At each visit, the subjects were administered a comprehensive battery to measure psychological makeup, health status, substance use and psychiatric disorder, and their overall harmfulness of substance consumption was quantified according to the multidimensional criteria (physical, dependence, and social) developed by Nutt et al. (2007). Next, high- and low- substance use severity trajectories were derived differentially associated with probability of segueing to substance use disorder (SUD). ML methodology was employed to predict trajectory membership.

findingsThe high-severity trajectory group had a higher probability of leading to SUD than the low-severity trajectory (89.0% vs 32.4%; odds ratio = 16.88, p < 0.0001). Thirty psychological and health status items at each of the six visits predict membership in the high- or low-severity trajectory, with 71% accuracy at 10-12 years of age, increasing to 93% at 22 years of age.

conclusionThese findings demonstrate the applicability of the machine learning methodology for detecting membership in a substance use trajectory with high probability of culminating in SUD, potentially informing primary and secondary prevention.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPsychological TechniquesSeverity of Illness IndexAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsSubstance-Related DisordersYoung AdultMachine learningRandom ForestSubstance misuse preventionSubstance use disorderTrajectory analysis

Identifiers

PMID31615693
PMCPMC7476073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.