Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31615599›Full record

ArticleEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2019

Estimating the 'PrEP Gap': how implementation and access to PrEP differ between countries in Europe and Central Asia in 2019.

Rosalie Hayes, Axel J Schmidt, Anastasia Pharris, Yusef Azad, Alison E Brown, Peter Weatherburn, Ford Hickson, Valerie Delpech, Teymur Noori, ECDC Dublin Declaration Monitoring Network

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rosalie HayesNational AIDS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Axel J SchmidtSigma Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Anastasia PharrisEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden.
Yusef AzadNational AIDS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Alison E BrownPublic Health England, London, United Kingdom.
Peter WeatherburnSigma Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Ford HicksonSigma Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Valerie DelpechPublic Health England, London, United Kingdom.
Teymur NooriEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden.
ECDC Dublin Declaration Monitoring NetworkThe members of the ECDC Dublin Declaration Monitoring group are listed at the end of the article.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2019, only 14 European and Central Asian countries provided reimbursed HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Using EMIS-2017 data, we present the difference between self-reported use and expressed need for PrEP in individual countries and the European Union (EU). We estimate that 500,000 men who have sex with men in the EU cannot access PrEP, although they would be very likely to use it. PrEP's potential to eliminate HIV is currently unrealised by national healthcare systems.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsAsiaDelivery of Health CareEuropeHealth Services AccessibilityHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMalePre-Exposure ProphylaxisAnti-HIV AgentsEurope and Central AsiaEuropean UnionHuman Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)Men who have sex with Men (MSM)Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)

Identifiers

PMID31615599
PMCPMC6794989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.