Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31615576›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2019

Problem formulation for gene drive mosquitoes designed to reduce malaria transmission in Africa: results from four regional consultations 2016-2018.

John L Teem, Aggrey Ambali, Barbara Glover, Jeremy Ouedraogo, Diran Makinde, Andrew Roberts

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Global Governing Bodies: A Pathway for Gene Drive Governance for Vector Mosquito Control.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John L TeemILSI Research Foundation, 740 Fifteenth Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC, 20005, USA.
Aggrey AmbaliNEPAD Agency, Industrialization, Science, Technology and Innovation Hub, 230 15th Road, Midrand, South Africa.
Barbara GloverNEPAD Agency, Industrialization, Science, Technology and Innovation Hub, 230 15th Road, Midrand, South Africa.
Jeremy OuedraogoABNE, NEPAD Regional Office West Africa, Hann Maristes 2, Rue HB 350, BP 17204, Dakar, Senegal.
Diran MakindeNEPAD Agency, Industrialization, Science, Technology and Innovation Hub, 230 15th Road, Midrand, South Africa.
Andrew RobertsILSI Research Foundation, 740 Fifteenth Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC, 20005, USA. aroberts@ilsi.org.
International Life Sciences Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGene drive mosquitoes have been proposed as a possible means to reduce the transmission of malaria in Africa. Because this technology has no prior use-history at this time, environmental risk assessments for gene drive mosquitoes will benefit from problem formulation-an organized and ordered process to identify protection goals and potential pathways to harm to the environment, or animal or human health. Recognizing this need, the New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD), with support from African and international partners, organized four regional consultative workshops in Africa to initiate this process.

methodsThe workshops were attended by a diverse set of participants and stakeholders, including scientists, ethicists, health professionals, government regulators in the fields of environment health and biosafety as well government policymakers, who met for 4 days to deliberate on protection goals and pathways relevant to the use of gene drive mosquitoes for malaria control. The goal of the workshops was not to produce a comprehensive and detailed environmental risk assessment of gene drive mosquitoes, but rather to introduce problem formulation as a tool to the stakeholder community, and to serve as a starting point for conducting systematic environmental risk assessments in the future, identifying protection goals related to gene drive mosquitoes that are particular to African stakeholders.

resultsParticipants in the workshops frequently identified human health and biodiversity as being relevant broad protection goals. Results of the deliberations provide insight into the concerns of African participants at an early stage in the development of gene drive organism/products that should be instructive to developers using this technology.

conclusionsIn general, the African participants of the consultations had a precautionary perspective with regard to environmental risk assessment of gene drive technology. As gene drive technology develops, protection goals will become further refined and candidate products will be further defined. These workshops represent only the beginning of a continuing process that will ultimately inform environmental risk assessment for gene drive mosquitoes to control malaria in Africa.

Indexed as

AfricaAnimalsAnophelesGene Drive TechnologyMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsRisk AssessmentAnopheles gambiaeGene driveProblem formulationRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID31615576
PMCPMC6794889
OpenAlexW2981213952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.