Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31615560›Full record

Observational studyJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2019

A novel endothelial damage inhibitor for the treatment of vascular conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting: protocol and rationale for the European, multicentre, prospective, observational DuraGraft registry.

Etem Caliskan, Sigrid Sandner, Martin Misfeld, Jose Aramendi, Sacha P Salzberg, Yeong-Hoon Choi, Vilas Satishchandran, Geeta Iyer, Louis P Perrault, Andreas Böning and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02922088 (European), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02922088 unknown statusnot on this map

European (EU) Multi-Center Registry to Assess Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery: Treatment of Vascular Conduits With DuraGraft®, a Novel Endothelial Damage Inhibitor [VASC]

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSomahlution LLCRan2016 to 2024Enrolled2,964ConditionsCardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Artery DiseaseArmsDuraGraft
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Outcomes after surgical revascularization in diabetic patients.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effects of hypoxia versus ischaemia on vascular functions of isolated rat thoracic aorta: revisiting theKardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Graft Preservation Solution DuraGraftPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Etem CaliskanDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sigrid SandnerDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Martin MisfeldUniversity Clinic of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Jose AramendiDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Hospital de Cruces, Barakaldo, Spain.
Sacha P SalzbergHeart Clinic, Hirslanden, Zürich, Switzerland.
Yeong-Hoon ChoiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Center of the University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Vilas SatishchandranSomahlution, Jupiter, FL, USA.
Geeta IyerSomahlution, Jupiter, FL, USA.
Louis P PerraultDepartment of Surgery, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Andreas BöningDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Justus-Liebig University Gießen, Gießen, Germany.
Maximilian Y EmmertDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. emmert@dhzb.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVein graft disease (VGD) impairs graft patency rates and long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). DuraGraft is a novel endothelial-damage inhibitor developed to efficiently protect the structural and functional integrity of the vascular endothelium. The DuraGraft registry will evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of DuraGraft in patients undergoing CABG procedures.

methodsThis ongoing multicentre, prospective observational registry will enrol 3000 patients undergoing an isolated CABG procedure or a combined procedure (ie, CABG plus valve surgery or other surgery) with at least one saphenous vein grafts or one free arterial graft (ie, radial artery or mammary artery). If a patient is enrolled, all free grafts (SVG and arterial will be treated with DuraGraft. Data on baseline, clinical, and angiographic characteristics as well as procedural and clinical events will be collected. The primary outcome measure is the occurrence of a major adverse cardiac event (MACE; defined as death, non-fatal myocardial-infarction, or need for repeat-revascularisation). Secondary outcome measures are the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; defined as death, non-fatal myocardial-infarction, repeat-revascularisation, or stroke), patient-reported quality of life, and health-economic data. Patient assessments will be performed during hospitalisation, at 1-month, 1-year, and annually thereafter to 5 years post-CABG. Events will be adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee. This European, multi-institutional registry will provide detailed insights into clinical outcome associated with DuraGraft. DISCUSSION: This European, multi-institutional registry will provide detailed insights into clinical outcome associated with the use of DuraGraft. Beyond that, and given the comprehensive data sets comprising of patient, procedural, and graft parameters that are being collected, the registry will enable for multiple subgroup analyses targeting focus groups or specific clinical questions. These may include analysis of subpopulations such as patients with diabetes or multimorbid high-risk patients (patient level), evaluation of relevance of harvesting technique including endoscopic versus open conduit harvesting (procedural level), or particular graft-specific aspects (conduit level).

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02922088 . Registered October 3, 2016. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The regional ethics committees have approved the registry. Results will be submitted for publication.

Indexed as

Vascular PatencyAgedCoronary Artery BypassCoronary Artery DiseaseEndoscopyEndothelium, VascularFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMammary ArteriesMiddle AgedMortalityMyocardial InfarctionOrgan Preservation SolutionsProspective StudiesOrgan Preservation SolutionsCoronary artery bypass graftingEndothelial damage inhibitorMyocardial infarctionPatencySaphenous vein graftVein graft failure

Identifiers

PMID31615560
PMCPMC6794868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.