Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31615475›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2019

A pair-wise meta-analysis highlights circular RNAs as potential biomarkers for colorectal cancer.

Chen Li, Xinli He, Lele Zhang, Lanying Li, Wenzhao Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Circular RNA in colorectal cancer.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chen LiDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, 471000, Henan Province, China.
Xinli HeDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, 471000, Henan Province, China.
Lele ZhangDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, 471000, Henan Province, China.
Lanying LiDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, 471000, Henan Province, China.
Wenzhao ZhaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, No.24 Jinghua Road, Jianxi District, Luoyang, 471000, Henan Province, China. yfyzwz@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4084-8503
Henan University of Science and Technology · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCircular RNAs (circRNAs) have emerged as a special subset of endogenous RNAs that are implicated in tumorigenesis and cancer progression. Herein we aim to carry out a meta-analysis to evaluate the clinicopathologic, diagnostic and prognostic significance of circRNA expression in colorectal cancer (CRC).

methodsA systematic search of online databases was performed for original articles published in English, which investigated the diagnostic accuracy, prognostic utility, and clinicopathologic association of circRNA(s) in CRC. Data were strictly extracted and study bias was judged using the Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy II (QUADAS II) and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) checklists.

resultsA total of 13 studies, involving 1430 patients with CRC, were included in the meta-analysis. The clinicopathologic study showed that abnormally expressed circRNAs were correlated with tumor diameter (P = 0.0350), differentiation (P = 0.0038), lymphatic metastasis (P = 0.0119), distant metastasis (P < 0.0001), TNM stage (P = 0.0002), and depth of invasion (P = 0.001) in patients with CRC. The summary area under the curve (AUC) of circRNA for the discriminative efficacy between patients with and without CRC was estimated to be 0.79, corresponding to a weighted sensitivity of 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-0.79], specificity of 0.67 (95%CI: 0.64-0.70), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 7.52 (95%CI: 4.66-12.12). Survival analysis showed that highly expressed circRNAs were correlated with significantly worse overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.66, 95%CI: 2.03-3.50, P = 0.000; X

conclusionAbnormally expressed circRNAs may be auxiliary biomarkers facilitating CRC diagnosis, and promising prognostic biomarkers in predicting the survival of CRC patients.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsGene ExpressionHumansLymphatic MetastasisNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsPublication BiasReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, CircularSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, RNATumor BurdenBiomarkers, TumorRNA, CircularCircular RNAClinicopathologic associationColorectal cancerDiagnosisMeta-analysisPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID31615475
PMCPMC6794748
OpenAlexW2980386025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.