Trial reportBMC cancer2019
Randomized, phase II trial of sequential hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and sorafenib versus sorafenib alone as initial therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: SCOOP-2 trial.
Trial report in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- First-line therapies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitors and transarterial therapies based on 35 randomized trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Response Rate Correlates with the Conversion Rate in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Systemic or Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review.Digestive surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of efficacy and safety of adjuvant therapies versus sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Locoregional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and safety of multimodality treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: patient-level network meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- External radiotherapy combined with sorafenib has better efficacy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical practice guidelines and real-life practice in hepatocellular carcinoma: A Japanese perspective.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2023Guideline
- Sorafenib Plus Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023Pooled it
- Molecular targeted therapy and immunotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.Annals of medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- 2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2022Guideline
- Objective Response Predicts Survival in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Systemic Therapies.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022Pooled it
- Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review with meta-analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Pooled it
- Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Era of Systemic Therapies (2020-2025).Liver cancer · 2026Review
- Prevalence of gastrointestinal side effects in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving sorafenib: a meta-analysis of 136 studies and 14,416 patients.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
- Conversion Surgery after Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Based Combination Therapy for Initially Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Liver cancer · 2025Article
- Comparison analysis of different doses bevacizumab plus ICIs and interventional therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a real-world study.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Current research status and future directions of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Efficacy of sorafenib combined with transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- HAIC plus lenvatinib and tislelizumab for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with Vp4 portal vein invasion.Hepatology international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. We conducted a multi-center randomized phase II study comparing a sequential HAIC-sorafenib regimen versus sorafenib alone as an initial therapy for HCC.
methodsPatients were randomly assigned (ratio, 1:1) to receive sequential HAIC with cisplatin followed by sorafenib (HAIC group, n = 35) or sorafenib alone (sorafenib group, n = 33) as an initial therapy. The primary endpoint was the one-year survival rate. Secondary endpoint included overall survival (OS), the 2-year survival rate, the time-to-progression (TTP), the objective response rate (ORR), the disease control rate (DCR), and safety.
resultsFor the primary endpoint, the one-year survival rates were 46% in the HAIC group and 58% in the sorafenib group. The median OS period was 10.0 months (95% CI, 7.0-18.8) in the HAIC group and 15.2 months (95% CI, 8.2-19.7) in the sorafenib group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.86, P = 0.78). The median TTP, ORR and DCR in the HAIC group were 2.8 months (95% CI, 1.7-5.5), 14.3, and 45.7%, respectively, while those in the sorafenib group were 3.9 months (95% CI, 2.3-6.8), 9.1, and 45.5%, respectively. No unexpected adverse events related to HAIC or sorafenib were observed in either group.
conclusionsSequential HAIC with cisplatin and sorafenib does not improve the survival benefit, compared with sorafenib alone, when used as an initial therapy for advanced HCC. However, this study was underpowered in regard to its primary and secondary endpoints, so the results should be interpreted with caution.
trial registrationUMIN ID 000006147 , registration data: August 11, 2011.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.