ArticleBMC infectious diseases2019
Blood stream infections associated with central and peripheral venous catheters.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06893939 (Limited Versus Extended Trophic Feeding), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Limited Versus Extended Trophic Feeding (LET-FEED) Trial
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preventive Activity of Paroxetine Against the Formation of Mixed Biofilms of Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus on Peripheral Venous Catheters.Current microbiology · 2026Article
- Improved Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Maintenance by In-Line Mechanical Pulse.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Retrospective Evaluation of Central Venous Catheter Use for Parenteral Nutrition in Pediatric Intestinal Failure: Infections and Taurolidine Role.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Peripheral Intravenous Catheters in Hospitalized Surgical Patients: A US Real-World Data Analysis.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Incidence of Bacterial Colonization of Intravenous Non-Permanent Venous Catheters in Hospitalized Equine Patients.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Reliability of differential time to positivity technique for diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections: a retrospective analysis.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Antibiotic lock therapy for the treatment of peripherally inserted central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection in patients with hematological malignancies: a single center retrospective study.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Article
- The Effectiveness of Taurolidine Antimicrobial Locks in Preventing Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections (CRBSIs) in Children Receiving Parenteral Nutrition: A Case Series.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Why do patients with cancer die?Nature reviews. Cancer · 2024Review
- Clinical Outcome of Patients withPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Central venous access device terminologies, complications, and reason for removal in oncology: a scoping review.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Article
- Phenotypic and Genotypic Assays to Evaluate Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Biofilm Production in Bloodstream Infections.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Understanding the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection: real-time monitoring of biofilm growth dynamics using time-lapse optical microscopy.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
- Incidence Rate, Pathogens and Economic Burden of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection: A Single-Center, Retrospective Case-Control Study.Infection and drug resistance · 2023Article
- Characteristics ofAccess microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purposes of this study were to determine the incidence of central and peripheral venous catheter-related bacteraemias, the relationship between the suspected and final confirmed bacteraemia origins, and the differences in microbiological, epidemiological, clinical, and analytical characteristics between the groups, including evolution to death.
methodsThis was a 7-year descriptive retrospective populational study of all bloodstream infections, comparing central (CB) and peripheral (PB) venous catheter-related bacteraemias in patients older than 15 years.
resultsIn all, 285 catheter-related bacteraemia patients, 220 with CBs (77.19%) and 65 with PBs (22.81%), were analysed among 1866 cases with bloodstream infections. The cumulative incidence per 1000 patients-day of hospital stay was 0.36 for CB and 0.106 for PB. In terms of the suspected origin, there was less accuracy in diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections (68. 2%) than those of other origins (78. 4%), p < 0.001. The accuracy was greater for PB (75%) than for CB (66. 2%), Coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most frequent microorganisms in both groups but occurred 1.57 times more frequently in CB (64.1%/40.6%) (p = 0.004), while Staphylococcus aureus (23. 4%/9.5%) (p = 0.02) and Enterobacteriae species (15.6%/6. 3%) (p = 0.003) were 2.5 times more frequent in PB. The CB patients stayed at the hospital for an average of 7.44 days longer than did the PB patients; more CB patients had active neoplasia (70. 4%/32.8%), more had surgery in the previous week (29. 2%/8. 3%), and fewer received adequate empirical treatment (53.9%/ 62.5%). Catheter was not removed in 8. 2% of CB and 3.7% of PB. On the other hand, the CB and PB patients had similar Pitt scores at blood extraction (median 0.89 versus 0.84 points, respectively; p = 0.8) and similar survival rates at hospital discharge (91.1% versus 90. 2%; p = 0.81).
conclusionsCentral catheters were more frequent sources of bacteraemias than were peripheral catheters. There were important differences in the microbiological aetiology as well. PB patients received correct empirical antibiotic treatment more frequently and had a higher initial rate of correct determination of the suspected source of bacteraemia. Differences in the microbiological aetiology and empirical antibiotic treatment received, and probably catheter removal and time to catheter removal could explain why CB and PB patients had similar survival rates .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.