Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31615450›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2019

Blood stream infections associated with central and peripheral venous catheters.

Jose Manuel Ruiz-Giardin, Iciar Ochoa Chamorro, Laura Velázquez Ríos, Jeronimo Jaqueti Aroca, Maria Isabel García Arata, Juan Víctor SanMartín López, Marta Guerrero Santillán

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06893939 (Limited Versus Extended Trophic Feeding), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06893939 phase2 / phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Limited Versus Extended Trophic Feeding (LET-FEED) Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2025 to 2031Enrolled350ConditionsSepsis, Length of Stay, Mortality, Neurodevelopmental DelayArmsLimited Trophic Feeds (1 day of trophic feeds), Extended Trophic Feeds (3 days of trophics)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Why do patients with cancer die?Nature reviews. Cancer · 2024
    Review
  14. Clinical Outcome of Patients withPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Characteristics ofAccess microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jose Manuel Ruiz-GiardinInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Camino del Molino nº 2, 28942, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain. josemanuel.ruiz@salud.madrid.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9459-7386
Iciar Ochoa ChamorroInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Camino del Molino nº 2, 28942, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
Laura Velázquez RíosInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Camino del Molino nº 2, 28942, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
Jeronimo Jaqueti ArocaClinical Analysis Department, Microbiology Unit, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
Maria Isabel García ArataClinical Analysis Department, Microbiology Unit, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
Juan Víctor SanMartín LópezInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Camino del Molino nº 2, 28942, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
Marta Guerrero SantillánInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Camino del Molino nº 2, 28942, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purposes of this study were to determine the incidence of central and peripheral venous catheter-related bacteraemias, the relationship between the suspected and final confirmed bacteraemia origins, and the differences in microbiological, epidemiological, clinical, and analytical characteristics between the groups, including evolution to death.

methodsThis was a 7-year descriptive retrospective populational study of all bloodstream infections, comparing central (CB) and peripheral (PB) venous catheter-related bacteraemias in patients older than 15 years.

resultsIn all, 285 catheter-related bacteraemia patients, 220 with CBs (77.19%) and 65 with PBs (22.81%), were analysed among 1866 cases with bloodstream infections. The cumulative incidence per 1000 patients-day of hospital stay was 0.36 for CB and 0.106 for PB. In terms of the suspected origin, there was less accuracy in diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections (68. 2%) than those of other origins (78. 4%), p <  0.001. The accuracy was greater for PB (75%) than for CB (66. 2%), Coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most frequent microorganisms in both groups but occurred 1.57 times more frequently in CB (64.1%/40.6%) (p = 0.004), while Staphylococcus aureus (23. 4%/9.5%) (p = 0.02) and Enterobacteriae species (15.6%/6. 3%) (p = 0.003) were 2.5 times more frequent in PB. The CB patients stayed at the hospital for an average of 7.44 days longer than did the PB patients; more CB patients had active neoplasia (70. 4%/32.8%), more had surgery in the previous week (29. 2%/8. 3%), and fewer received adequate empirical treatment (53.9%/ 62.5%). Catheter was not removed in 8. 2% of CB and 3.7% of PB. On the other hand, the CB and PB patients had similar Pitt scores at blood extraction (median 0.89 versus 0.84 points, respectively; p = 0.8) and similar survival rates at hospital discharge (91.1% versus 90. 2%; p = 0.81).

conclusionsCentral catheters were more frequent sources of bacteraemias than were peripheral catheters. There were important differences in the microbiological aetiology as well. PB patients received correct empirical antibiotic treatment more frequently and had a higher initial rate of correct determination of the suspected source of bacteraemia. Differences in the microbiological aetiology and empirical antibiotic treatment received, and probably catheter removal and time to catheter removal could explain why CB and PB patients had similar survival rates .

Indexed as

BacteremiaCatheterization, Central VenousCatheterization, PeripheralCatheter-Related InfectionsCatheters, IndwellingEnterobacteriaceaeHumansLength of StayRetrospective StudiesStaphylococcus aureusSurvival RateBacteraemiaBloodstream infectionCentral venous catheterPeripheral venous catheter

Identifiers

PMID31615450
PMCPMC6794764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.