ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019
VarSight: prioritizing clinically reported variants with binary classification algorithms.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02450851 (Clinical and Genetic Evaluation of Patients With Undiagnosed Disorders Through the Undiagnosed Diseases Network), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical and Genetic Evaluation of Patients With Undiagnosed Disorders Through the Undiagnosed Diseases Network
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omic analysis identifies a multi-step pathology in a case of multiple chorangioma syndrome in monochorionic twins.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Study design with responsible return of results for a fully remote genome sequencing study in individuals with Prader-Willi syndrome.Genetics in medicine open · 2026Article
- Large Language Models in Genomics-A Perspective on Personalized Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Urgency Prediction for Medical Laboratory Tests Through Optimal Sparse Decision Tree: Case Study With Echocardiograms.JMIR AI · 2025Article
- Contributions of rare and common variation to early-onset and atypical dementia risk.Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2023Article
- Contributions of rare and common variation to early-onset and atypical dementia risk.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Phenotype-aware prioritisation of rare Mendelian disease variants.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2022Review
- Diagnosis of a Single-Nucleotide Variant in Whole-Exome Sequencing Data for Patients With Inherited Diseases: Machine Learning Study Using Artificial Intelligence Variant Prioritization.JMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Neptune: an environment for the delivery of genomic medicine.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Article
- Detection of a mosaic CDKL5 deletion and inversion by optical genome mapping ends an exhaustive diagnostic odyssey.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2021Article
- Phen2Gene: rapid phenotype-driven gene prioritization for rare diseases.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Applying whole-genome sequencing in relation to phenotype and outcomes in siblings with cystic fibrosis.Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2020Article
- Genome sequencing for early-onset or atypical dementia: high diagnostic yield and frequent observation of multiple contributory alleles.Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhen applying genomic medicine to a rare disease patient, the primary goal is to identify one or more genomic variants that may explain the patient's phenotypes. Typically, this is done through annotation, filtering, and then prioritization of variants for manual curation. However, prioritization of variants in rare disease patients remains a challenging task due to the high degree of variability in phenotype presentation and molecular source of disease. Thus, methods that can identify and/or prioritize variants to be clinically reported in the presence of such variability are of critical importance.
methodsWe tested the application of classification algorithms that ingest variant annotations along with phenotype information for predicting whether a variant will ultimately be clinically reported and returned to a patient. To test the classifiers, we performed a retrospective study on variants that were clinically reported to 237 patients in the Undiagnosed Diseases Network.
resultsWe treated the classifiers as variant prioritization systems and compared them to four variant prioritization algorithms and two single-measure controls. We showed that the trained classifiers outperformed all other tested methods with the best classifiers ranking 72% of all reported variants and 94% of reported pathogenic variants in the top 20.
conclusionsWe demonstrated how freely available binary classification algorithms can be used to prioritize variants even in the presence of real-world variability. Furthermore, these classifiers outperformed all other tested methods, suggesting that they may be well suited for working with real rare disease patient datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.