Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31615373›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2019

Genetic convergence of industrial melanism in three geometrid moths.

Arjen E Van't Hof, Louise A Reynolds, Carl J Yung, Laurence M Cook, Ilik J Saccheri

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A long noncoding RNA at theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. The genome sequence of the Common Pug,Wellcome open research · 2023
    Article
  8. Environmental variation and biotic interactions limit adaptation at ecological margins: lessons from rainforestPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. eLife · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arjen E Van't HofInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK.
Louise A ReynoldsInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK.
Carl J YungInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK.
Laurence M CookDepartment of Entomology, The Manchester Museum, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
Ilik J SaccheriInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK.
University of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rise of dark (melanic) forms of many species of moth in heavily coal-polluted areas of nineteenth- and twentieth-century Britain, and their post-1970s fall, point to a common selective pressure (camouflage against bird predators) acting at the community level. The extent to which this convergent phenotypic response relied on similar genetic and developmental mechanisms is unknown. We examine this problem by testing the hypothesis that the locus controlling melanism in

Indexed as

MelanosisMothsAllelesAnimalsChromosome MappingPigmentationcortexLepidopteramelanismparallel evolution

Identifiers

PMID31615373
PMCPMC6832188
OpenAlexW2980937816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.