Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31615361›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Variation at an adhesin locus suggests sociality in natural populations of the yeast

Zachary J Oppler, Meadow E Parrish, Helen A Murphy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zachary J OpplerDepartment of Biology, William & Mary, PO Box 8795, Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795, USA.
Meadow E ParrishDepartment of Biology, William & Mary, PO Box 8795, Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795, USA.
Helen A MurphyDepartment of Biology, William & Mary, PO Box 8795, Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795, USA.

Funding

The Evolution and Genetics of a Complex Fungal Virulence TraitR15GM122032 · NIGMS · COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY · PI MURPHY, HELEN ANNE · 2017 to 2017
$307k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM122032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbes engage in numerous social behaviours that are critical for survival and reproduction, and that require individuals to act as a collective. Various mechanisms ensure that collectives are composed of related, cooperating cells, thus allowing for the evolution and stability of these traits, and for selection to favour traits beneficial to the collective. Since microbes are difficult to observe directly, sociality in natural populations can instead be investigated using evolutionary genetic signatures, as social loci can be evolutionary hotspots. The budding yeast has been studied for over a century, yet little is known about its social behaviour in nature. Flo11 is a highly regulated cell adhesin required for most laboratory social phenotypes; studies suggest it may function in cell recognition and its heterogeneous expression may be adaptive for collectives such as biofilms. We investigated this locus and found positive selection in the areas implicated in cell-cell interaction, suggesting selection for kin discrimination. We also found balancing selection at an upstream activation site, suggesting selection on the level of variegated gene expression. Our results suggest this model yeast is surprisingly social in natural environments and is probably engaging in various forms of sociality. By using genomic data, this research provides a glimpse of otherwise unobservable interactions.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhenotypeSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSelection, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteinsadaptive heterogeneityadhesincooperationFLO11kin recognitionSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID31615361
PMCPMC6834051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.