ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019
Predicting population responses to environmental change from individual-level mechanisms: towards a standardized mechanistic approach.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can Fecal T3 Metabolite Level Fluctuations in European Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus) Give Insights on Body Condition and Thermal Stress?Integrative zoology · 2026Article
- CartograPlant: bridging genomic, phenotypic, and environmental data to advance plant resilience and eco-evolutionary insight.Genetics · 2026Article
- Impact of seasonal changes on the epidemiology of Lassa fever in a state in North Central, Nigeria.Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2026Article
- Effects of storage conditions on oxidative stress biomarkers: methodological implications for ecological and evolutionary studies.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026Article
- Developmental Stage-Specific Responses to Extreme Climatic Events and Environmental Variability in Great Tit Nestlings.Global change biology · 2026Article
- Understanding and Predicting Population Response to Anthropogenic Disturbance: Current Approaches and Novel Opportunities.Ecology letters · 2025Review
- Simulating the efficacy of wolf-dog hybridization management with individual-based modeling.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025Article
- Simulating macroevolutionary trends and open-ended evolution with a novel mechanistic multi-level approach.PloS one · 2025Article
- Evolutionary ecophysiology in extreme environments under a global change scenario.Conservation physiology · 2025Article
- Role of vector phenotypic plasticity in disease transmission as illustrated by the spread of dengue virus by Aedes albopictus.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Linking diet switching to reproductive performance across populations of two critically endangered mammalian herbivores.Communications biology · 2024Article
- A conceptual framework for understanding stress-induced physiological and transgenerational effects on population responses to climate change.Evolution letters · 2024Article
- Evolutionary adaptation to climate change.Evolution letters · 2024Article
- Evolutionary potential mitigates extinction risk under climate change in the endangered southwestern willow flycatcher.The Journal of heredity · 2023Article
- A demographic approach for predicting population responses to multifactorial stressors.AoB PLANTS · 2023Review
- Individual differences in habitat selection mediate landscape level predictions of a functional response.Oecologia · 2022Article
- A review of bioenergetic modelling for marine mammal populations.Conservation physiology · 2022Article
- A Heuristic and Data Mining Model for Predicting Broiler House Environment Suitability.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Anticipation of common buzzard population patterns in the changing UK landscape.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- What do you mean "functional" in ecology? Patterns versus processes.Ecology and evolution · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Animal populations will mediate the response of global biodiversity to environmental changes. Population models are thus important tools for both understanding and predicting animal responses to uncertain future conditions. Most approaches, however, are correlative and ignore the individual-level mechanisms that give rise to population dynamics. Here, we assess several existing population modelling approaches and find limitations to both 'correlative' and 'mechanistic' models. We advocate the need for a standardized mechanistic approach for linking individual mechanisms (physiology, behaviour, and evolution) to population dynamics in spatially explicit landscapes. Such an approach is potentially more flexible and informative than current population models. Key to realizing this goal, however, is overcoming current data limitations, the development and testing of eco-evolutionary theory to represent interactions between individual mechanisms, and standardized multi-dimensional environmental change scenarios which incorporate multiple stressors. Such progress is essential in supporting environmental decisions in uncertain future conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.