Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31615354›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Differential female sociality is linked with the fine-scale structure of sexual interactions in replicate groups of red junglefowl,

Grant C McDonald, Lewis G Spurgin, Eleanor A Fairfield, David S Richardson, Tommaso Pizzari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Temporal dynamics of competitive fertilization in social groups of red junglefowl (Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sexual conflict and social networks in bed bugs: effects of social experience.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Grant C McDonaldEdward Grey Institute, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lewis G SpurginSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Eleanor A FairfieldSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
David S RichardsonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Tommaso PizzariEdward Grey Institute, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L009587/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N011759/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent work indicates that social structure has extensive implications for patterns of sexual selection and sexual conflict. However, little is known about the individual variation in social behaviours linking social structure to sexual interactions. Here, we use network analysis of replicate polygynandrous groups of red junglefowl (

Indexed as

Sexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsChickensFemaleMaleMating Preference, AnimalReproductionSocial BehaviorGalluspolyandrysexual networkssexual selectionsocial networkssocial niche construction

Identifiers

PMID31615354
PMCPMC6834046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.