Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31615134›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

Cortical Visual Evoked Potentials and Growth in Infants Fed with Bioactive Compounds-Enriched Infant Formula: Results from COGNIS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Ana Nieto-Ruiz, José Antonio García-Santos, Mercedes G Bermúdez, Florian Herrmann, Estefanía Diéguez, Natalia Sepúlveda-Valbuena, Salomé García, M Teresa Miranda, Roser De-Castellar, María Rodríguez-Palmero and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Nieto-RuizEURISTIKOS Excellence Centre for Paediatric Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain. ananietoruiz@gmail.com.
José Antonio García-SantosEURISTIKOS Excellence Centre for Paediatric Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain. joseantonio_gsantos@outlook.es.
Mercedes G BermúdezEURISTIKOS Excellence Centre for Paediatric Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain. mgbermudez@ugr.es.
Florian HerrmannEURISTIKOS Excellence Centre for Paediatric Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain. dr.f.herrmann@gmail.com.
Estefanía DiéguezEURISTIKOS Excellence Centre for Paediatric Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain. estefaniadieguezcastillo@gmail.com.
Natalia Sepúlveda-ValbuenaEURISTIKOS Excellence Centre for Paediatric Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain. sepulveda.natalia@hotmail.com.
Salomé GarcíaClinical Service of Neurophysiology, Clinical University Hospital San Cecilio, 18016 Granada, Spain. salomegarcia2@yahoo.es.
M Teresa MirandaDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of Granada,18016 Granada, Spain. salomegarcia2@yahoo.es.
Roser De-CastellarOrdesaLaboratories, S.L., 08820 Barcelona, Spain. Roser.DeCastellar@ordesa.es.
María Rodríguez-PalmeroOrdesaLaboratories, S.L., 08820 Barcelona, Spain. Maria.Rodriguez@ordesa.es.
Andrés CatenaMind, Brain and Behaviour Research Centre-CIMCYC, University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain. acatena@ugr.es.
Cristina CampoyEURISTIKOS Excellence Centre for Paediatric Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain. ccampoy@ugr.es.
Universidad de Granada · ESOrdesa (Spain) · ESInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada · ES

Funding

HORIZON 2020 EU DynaHEALTH Project 633595Ordesa Laboratorie, S.L. 3349SMARTFOODS (CIEN). Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness 4003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postnatal nutrition is essential for growth and neurodevelopment. We analyzed the influence of a new enriched-infant formula with bioactive compounds on growth, neurodevelopment, and visual function (VF) in healthy infants during their first 18 months of life. A total of 170 infants were randomized in the COGNIS randomized clinical trial (RCT) to receive a standard infant formula (SF = 85) or a new experimental infant formula supplemented with functional nutrients (EF = 85). As a control, 50 breastfed infants (BF) were enrolled. Growth patterns were evaluated up to 18 months of life; neurodevelopment was assessed by general movements at 2, 3, and 4 months; VF was measured by cortical visual evoked potentials at 3 and 12 months. No differences in growth and neurodevelopment were found between groups. Regarding VF, SF and EF infants presented prolonged latencies and lower amplitudes in the P100 wave than BF infants. In the EF group, a higher percentage of infants presented response at 7½'of arc at 12 months compared to 3 months of age; a similar proportion of BF and EF infants presented responses at 7½'of arc at 12 months of age. Early nutritional intervention with bioactive compounds could narrow the gap in growth and neurodevelopment between breastfed and formula-fed infants.

Indexed as

AdultBreast FeedingChild DevelopmentEvoked Potentials, VisualHumansInfantInfant FormulaInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaParentsPhytochemicalsPhytochemicalsbioactive compoundsbreastfeedinggrowthinfant formulavisual evoked potentials

Identifiers

PMID31615134
PMCPMC6835488
OpenAlexW2979888097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.