Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31615102›Full record

ReviewCells2019

Translational Application of Circulating DNA in Oncology: Review of the Last Decades Achievements.

Natalia O Tuaeva, Luca Falzone, Yuri B Porozov, Alexander E Nosyrev, Vladimir M Trukhan, Leda Kovatsi, Demetrios A Spandidos, Nikolaos Drakoulis, Alexandra Kalogeraki, Charalampos Mamoulakis and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Identification ofAging · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Natalia O TuaevaI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119048 Moscow, Russia. natalya.tuaeva@gmail.com.
Luca FalzoneDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnlogical Sciences, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy. luca.falzone@unict.it.
Yuri B PorozovI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119048 Moscow, Russia. yuri.porozov@gmail.com.
Alexander E NosyrevI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119048 Moscow, Russia. rerik2050@mail.ru.
Vladimir M TrukhanI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119048 Moscow, Russia. vladimir.trukhan@gmai.com.
Leda KovatsiLaboratory of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54248 Thessaloniki, Greece. kovatsi@med.auth.gr.
Demetrios A SpandidosLaboratory of Clinical Virology, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, 70013 Crete, Greece. spandidos@spandidos.gr.
Nikolaos DrakoulisResearch Group of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Faculty of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15771 Zografou, Greece. drakoulis@pharm.uoa.gr.
Alexandra KalogerakiDepartment of Pathology-Cytopathology, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, 70013 Crete, Greece. kalogerakimed@yahoo.gr.
Charalampos MamoulakisDepartment of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Medical School, Heraklion, 70013 Crete, Greece. mamoulak@uoc.gr.
George TzanakakisLaboratory of Anatomy-Histology-Embryology, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, 70013 Crete, Greece. tzanakak@med.uoc.gr.
Massimo LibraDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnlogical Sciences, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy. m.libra@unict.it.
Aristides TsatsakisI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119048 Moscow, Russia. tsatsaka@uoc.gr.
University of Crete · GRSechenov University · RUUniversity of Catania · ITAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRITMO University · RUNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the introduction of new molecular techniques in experimental and clinical settings has allowed researchers and clinicians to propose circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis and liquid biopsy as novel promising strategies for the early diagnosis of cancer and for the definition of patients' prognosis. It was widely demonstrated that through the non-invasive analysis of ctDNA, it is possible to identify and characterize the mutational status of tumors while avoiding invasive diagnostic strategies. Although a number of studies on ctDNA in patients' samples significantly contributed to the improvement of oncology practice, some investigations generated conflicting data about the diagnostic and prognostic significance of ctDNA. Hence, to highlight the relevant achievements obtained so far in this field, a clearer description of the current methodologies used, as well as the obtained results, are strongly needed. On these bases, this review discusses the most relevant studies on ctDNA analysis in cancer, as well as the future directions and applications of liquid biopsy. In particular, special attention was paid to the early diagnosis of primary cancer, to the diagnosis of tumors with an unknown primary location, and finally to the prognosis of cancer patients. Furthermore, the current limitations of ctDNA-based approaches and possible strategies to overcome these limitations are presented.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCirculating Tumor DNAHumansLiquid BiopsyNeoplasmsNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCirculating Tumor DNAbiomarkerctDNAdiagnosisgliomaliquid biopsymass-spectrometryNGSoncologyprognosisurological cancers

Identifiers

PMID31615102
PMCPMC6829588
OpenAlexW2980184007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.