Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31614964›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2019

Huihua Zhou, Chunlei Gai, Guifang Ye, Jian An, Kai Liu, La Xu, Haipeng Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bacteriophages in the Control ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  14. Role of phytobiotics in relieving the impacts ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Mechanism of the Potential Therapeutic CandidateFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Huihua ZhouNational Pathogen Collection Center for Aquatic Animals, Shanghai Collaborative Innovation for Aquatic Animal Genetics and Breeding, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Aquaculture, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China. zhouHH827@163.com.
Chunlei GaiMarine Biology Institute of Shandong, Qingdao 266104, China. chunlei317@163.com.
Guifang YeNational Pathogen Collection Center for Aquatic Animals, Shanghai Collaborative Innovation for Aquatic Animal Genetics and Breeding, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Aquaculture, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China. 18621092058@139.com.
Jian AnLianyungang Marine and Fisheries Development Promotion Center, Lianyungang 222000, China. anjian520@sohu.com.
Kai LiuInstitute of Fishery Science, Hangzhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310024, China. liukai0106@hz.cn.
La XuMarine Biology Institute of Shandong, Qingdao 266104, China. 18561729912@163.com.
Haipeng CaoNational Pathogen Collection Center for Aquatic Animals, Shanghai Collaborative Innovation for Aquatic Animal Genetics and Breeding, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Aquaculture, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China. hpcao@shou.edu.cn.

Funding

Fishery Sci-Tech Innovation and Popularization Project of Jiangsu Province Y2017-6Qingpu District Sci-Tech Development Program, Shanghai China QSD2018-11the Earmarked Fund for China Modern Shrimp Industry Technology Research nycytx-46
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Aeromonas hydrophilaflorfenicolLitopenaeus vannameiPunica granatumsynergist

Identifiers

PMID31614964
PMCPMC6843590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.