Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31614918›Full record

ArticleMedicines (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Targeting Aberrant Sialylation to Treat Cancer.

Jennifer Munkley, Emma Scott

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicines (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Adhesion to aggression: unravelling sLeClinical & experimental metastasis · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Targeting "don't eat me" signal: breast cancer immunotherapy.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. EarlyFrontiers in oncology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer MunkleyInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3BZ, UK. Jennifer.munkley@ncl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8631-4531
Emma ScottInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3BZ, UK. Emma.Scott@newcastle.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5358-5132
Newcastle University · GB

Funding

Prostate Cancer UK RIA16-ST2-011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell surface carbohydrates (known as glycans) are often aberrantly expressed or found at atypical levels in cancer. Glycans can impact all steps in tumour progression, from malignant transformation to metastasis, and have roles in all the cancer hallmarks. An increased understanding of glycans in the metastatic cascade offers exciting new therapeutic opportunities. Glycan-based targeting strategies are currently being tested in clinical trials and are a rich and untapped frontier for development. As we learn more about cancer glycobiology, new targets will continue to emerge for drug design. One key change in tumour glycosylation is the upregulation of cancer-associated sialylated glycans. Abnormal sialylation is integral to tumour growth, metastasis and immune evasion; therefore, targeting sialic acid moieties in cancer could be of high therapeutic value. Here, we summarise the changes to sialic acid biology in cancer and discuss recent advances and technologies bringing sialic-acid targeting treatments to the forefront of cancer therapeutics.

Indexed as

cancerglycansglycosylationimmunotherapysialic acidsialylationtherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID31614918
PMCPMC6963943
OpenAlexW2979702819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.