Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31614737›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Leaf Production and Expansion: A Generalized Response to Drought Stresses from Cells to Whole Leaf Biomass-A Case Study in the Tomato Compound Leaf.

Garance Koch, Gaëlle Rolland, Myriam Dauzat, Alexis Bédiée, Valentina Baldazzi, Nadia Bertin, Yann Guédon, Christine Granier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Multigenic regulation in the ethylene biosynthesis pathway during coffee flowering.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. ContrastingFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Characterization of dwarf and narrow leaf (Plant signaling & behavior · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Garance KochUniv Montpellier, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, LEPSE, 34095 Montpellier, France. garancekoch@gmail.com.
Gaëlle RollandUniv Montpellier, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, LEPSE, 34095 Montpellier, France. gaelle.rolland@inra.fr.
Myriam DauzatUniv Montpellier, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, LEPSE, 34095 Montpellier, France. myriam.dauzat@inra.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-7846-7397
Alexis BédiéeUniv Montpellier, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, LEPSE, 34095 Montpellier, France. alexis.bediee@inra.fr.
Valentina BaldazziUnité Plantes et Systèmes de culture Horticoles, INRA, UR 1115 PSH, F-84000 Avignon, France. valentina.baldazzi@inra.fr.
Nadia BertinUnité Plantes et Systèmes de culture Horticoles, INRA, UR 1115 PSH, F-84000 Avignon, France. nadia.bertin@inra.fr.
Yann GuédonUniv Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, AGAP, 34095 Montpellier, France. yann.guedon@cirad.fr.
Christine GranierUniv Montpellier, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, LEPSE, 34095 Montpellier, France. christine.granier@inra.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is clearly established that there is not a unique response to soil water deficit but that there are as many responses as soil water deficit characteristics: Drought intensity, drought duration, and drought position during plant cycle. For a same soil water deficit, responses can also differ on plant genotype within a same species. In spite of this variability, at least for leaf production and expansion processes, robust tendencies can be extracted from the literature when similar watering regimes are compared. Here, we present response curves and multi-scale dynamics analyses established on tomato plants exposed to different soil water deficit treatments. Results reinforce the trends already observed for other species: Reduction in plant leaf biomass under water stress was due to reduction in individual leaf biomass and areas whereas leaf production and specific leaf area were not affected. The dynamics of leaf expansion was modified both at the leaf and cell scales. Cell division and expansion were reduced by drought treatments as well as the endoreduplication process. Combining response curves analyses together with dynamic analyses of tomato compound leaf growth at different scales not only corroborate results on simple leaf responses to drought but also increases our knowledge on the cellular mechanisms behind leaf growth plasticity.

Indexed as

cell divisioncell expansiondroughtendoreduplicationleaf growthleaf productionplasticitytomato

Identifiers

PMID31614737
PMCPMC6843756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.