Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31614716›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

DockNmine, a Web Portal to Assemble and Analyse Virtual and Experimental Interaction Data.

Ennys Gheyouche, Romain Launay, Jean Lethiec, Antoine Labeeuw, Caroline Roze, Alan Amossé, Stéphane Téletchéa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. STOREFISH 2.0: a database on the reproductive strategies of teleost fishes.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ennys GheyoucheUFIP, Université de Nantes, UMR CNRS 6286, 2 rue de la Houssinière, 44322 Nantes, France. ennys.gheyouche@univ-nantes.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-5979-7283
Romain LaunayUFIP, Université de Nantes, UMR CNRS 6286, 2 rue de la Houssinière, 44322 Nantes, France. romain.launay1@etu.univ-nantes.fr.
Jean LethiecUFIP, Université de Nantes, UMR CNRS 6286, 2 rue de la Houssinière, 44322 Nantes, France. jean.lethiec@gmail.com.
Antoine LabeeuwUFIP, Université de Nantes, UMR CNRS 6286, 2 rue de la Houssinière, 44322 Nantes, France. antoine.labeeuw@etu.univ-nantes.fr.
Caroline RozeUFIP, Université de Nantes, UMR CNRS 6286, 2 rue de la Houssinière, 44322 Nantes, France. caroline@affilogic.com.
Alan AmosséUFIP, Université de Nantes, UMR CNRS 6286, 2 rue de la Houssinière, 44322 Nantes, France. alan.amosse@gmail.com.
Stéphane TéletchéaUFIP, Université de Nantes, UMR CNRS 6286, 2 rue de la Houssinière, 44322 Nantes, France. stephane.teletchea@univ-nantes.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-2402-028X

Funding

Université de Nantes ANR-16-IDEX-0007, TROPIC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientists have to perform multiple experiments producing qualitative and quantitative data to determine if a compound is able to bind to a given target. Due to the large diversity of the potential ligand chemical space, the possibility of experimentally exploring a lot of compounds on a target rapidly becomes out of reach. Scientists therefore need to use virtual screening methods to determine the putative binding mode of ligands on a protein and then post-process the raw docking experiments with a dedicated scoring function in relation with experimental data. Two of the major difficulties for comparing docking predictions with experiments mostly come from the lack of transferability of experimental data and the lack of standardisation in molecule names. Although large portals like PubChem or ChEMBL are available for general purpose, there is no service allowing a formal expert annotation of both experimental data and docking studies. To address these issues, researchers build their own collection of data in flat files, often in spreadsheets, with limited possibilities of extensive annotations or standardisation of ligand descriptions allowing cross-database retrieval. We have conceived the dockNmine platform to provide a service allowing an expert and authenticated annotation of ligands and targets. First, this portal allows a scientist to incorporate controlled information in the database using reference identifiers for the protein (Uniprot ID) and the ligand (SMILES description), the data and the publication associated to it. Second, it allows the incorporation of docking experiments using forms that automatically parse useful parameters and results. Last, the web interface provides a lot of pre-computed outputs to assess the degree of correlations between docking experiments and experimental data.

Indexed as

SoftwareAnimalsBinding SitesDrug DiscoveryHumansLigandsProtein BindingQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipSequence Analysis, ProteinLigandsdrug discovery and designprotein–ligand analysisstructure–activity relationships

Identifiers

PMID31614716
PMCPMC6829441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.