ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019
Cataract Services are Leaving Widows Behind: Examples from National Cross-Sectional Surveys in Nigeria and Sri Lanka.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Strategies to address inequity of uncorrected refractive error in the Western Pacific: A modified Delphi process.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2024Article
- Access to community-based eye services in Meru, Kenya: a cross-sectional equity analysis.International journal for equity in health · 2024Article
- Assessing the cataract surgical rate and gender equity in cataract services in south-east Nigeria.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Improvement studies for equitable and evidence-based innovation: an overview of the 'IM-SEEN' model.International journal for equity in health · 2023Article
- Socioeconomic position and eye health outcomes: identifying inequality in rapid population-based surveys.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Cataract services for all: Strategies for equitable access from a global modified Delphi process.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Visually significant cataract and associated factors among older people attending a community ophthalmic service in central Gondar Zone, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.The Journal of international medical research · 2022Article
- Grand Challenges in global eye health: a global prioritisation process using Delphi method.The lancet. Healthy longevity · 2022Article
- Assessing the capacity of primary health care facilities in Nigeria to deliver eye health promotion: Results of a mixed-methods feasibility study.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- How can we improve the quality of cataract services for all? A global scoping review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2021Article
- The Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health: vision beyond 2020.The Lancet. Global health · 2021Review
- Are we advancing universal health coverage through cataract services? Protocol for a scoping review.BMJ open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Sustainable Development Goals aim to leave no one behind. We explored the hypothesis that women without a living spouse-including those who are widowed, divorced, separated, and never married-are a vulnerable group being left behind by cataract services. Using national cross-sectional blindness surveys from Nigeria (2005-2007;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.