Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31614691›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2019

Theoretical Evaluation of Multi-Breed Genomic Prediction in Chinese Indigenous Cattle.

Lei Xu, Zezhao Wang, Bo Zhu, Ying Liu, Hongwei Li, Farhad Bordbar, Yan Chen, Lupei Zhang, Xue Gao, Huijiang Gao and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lei XuInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. xuleirock@163.com.
Zezhao WangInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. wangzezhao1@163.com.
Bo ZhuInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. zhubo@caas.cn.
Ying LiuInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. yliu2333@sina.com.
Hongwei LiInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. lihongweicaas@163.com.
Farhad BordbarInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. farhadnevergiveup@yahoo.com.
Yan ChenInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. chenyan0204@163.com.
Lupei ZhangInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. zhanglupei@caas.cn.
Xue GaoInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. gaoxue76@126.com.
Huijiang GaoInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. gaohj111@sina.com.
Shengli ZhangNational Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, Chinese agriculture University, Beijing 100193, China. zhangslcau@cau.edu.cn.
Lingyang XuInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. xulingyang@caas.cn.
Junya LiInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. lijunya@caas.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) has been widely considered as a valuable strategy for enhancing the rate of genetic gain in farm animals. However, the construction of a large reference population is a big challenge for small populations like indigenous cattle. In order to evaluate the potential application of GS for Chinese indigenous cattle, we assessed the influence of combining multiple populations on the reliability of genomic predictions for 10 indigenous breeds of Chinese cattle using simulated data. Also, we examined the effect of different genetic architecture on prediction accuracy. In this study, we simulated a set of genotype data by a resampling approach which can reflect the realistic linkage disequilibrium pattern for multiple populations. We found within-breed evaluations yielded the highest accuracies ranged from 0.64 to 0.68 for four different simulated genetic architectures. For scenarios using multiple breeds as reference, the predictive accuracies were higher when the reference was comprised of breeds with a close relationship, while the accuracies were low when prediction were carried out among breeds. In addition, the accuracy increased in all scenarios with the heritability increased. Our results suggested that using meta-population as reference can increase accuracy of genomic predictions for small populations. Moreover, multi-breed genomic selection was feasible for Chinese indigenous populations with genetic relationships.

Indexed as

Chinese indigenous cattlegenomic predictionlinkage disequilibriumresampling approaches

Identifiers

PMID31614691
PMCPMC6827096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.