Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31614484›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

An Overview of High Frequency Acoustic Sensors-QCMs, SAWs and FBARs-Chemical and Biochemical Applications.

Adnan Mujahid, Adeel Afzal, Franz L Dickert

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Spotlight on sensors as tools for biointelligence.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Topology-Optimized Bound States in the Continuum with High-Q Acoustic Field Enhancement.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Putting piezoelectric sensors into Fano resonances.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2024
    Article
  13. Real-world evaluation of a QCM-based biosensor for exhaled air.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Adnan MujahidDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Währinger Straße 38, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. adnanmujahid.chem@pu.edu.pk.ORCID 0000-0002-0903-7788
Adeel AfzalDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Währinger Straße 38, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. aa@aafzal.com.
Franz L DickertDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Währinger Straße 38, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. Franz.Dickert@univie.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0003-3053-8541
University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acoustic devices have found wide applications in chemical and biosensing fields owing to their high sensitivity, ruggedness, miniaturized design and integration ability with on-field electronic systems. One of the potential advantages of using these devices are their label-free detection mechanism since mass is the fundamental property of any target analyte which is monitored by these devices. Herein, we provide a concise overview of high frequency acoustic transducers such as quartz crystal microbalance (QCM), surface acoustic wave (SAW) and film bulk acoustic resonators (FBARs) to compare their working principles, resonance frequencies, selection of piezoelectric materials for their fabrication, temperature-frequency dependency and operation in the liquid phase. The selected sensor applications of these high frequency acoustic transducers are discussed primarily focusing on the two main sensing domains, i.e., biosensing for working in liquids and gas/vapor phase sensing. Furthermore, the sensor performance of high frequency acoustic transducers in selected cases is compared with well-established analytical tools such as liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS), gas chromatographic (GC) analysis and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods. Finally, a general comparison of these acoustic devices is conducted to discuss their strengths, limitations, and commercial adaptability thus, to select the most suitable transducer for a particular chemical/biochemical sensing domain.

Indexed as

biochemical sensorschemical sensorsfilm bulk acoustic wave resonator (FBAR)quartz crystal microbalance (QCM)surface acoustic wave (SAW)

Identifiers

PMID31614484
PMCPMC6833005
OpenAlexW2979855087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.