ArticleJournal of educational evaluation for health professions2019
Dreyfus scale-based feedback increases the medical student's satisfaction with the complex cluster part of the interviewing and physical examination course and skills' readiness in Taiwan.
Article in Journal of educational evaluation for health professions, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Outcome of management based on "1+X" model in a health examination center.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDifferent from the basic core part of the clinical interviewing and physical examination (PE) skills course in basic, head-to-toe, and thorax systems, learners need structural feedback for the development of the complex skills in cluster part including abdominal, neuromuscular and musculoskeletal systems. It aimed to evaluate the effects of replacing Dreyfus scale, which having elements of continuous professional development, with Likert scale in the feedback in cluster part of training in Taiwan.
methodsInstructors and final-year medical students of class 2015-2016 comprised the regular cohort, whereas those of class 2017-2018 formed the intervention cohort. In the intervention cohort, Dreyfus scale-based feedback rather than Likert scale based feedback was used in the cluster part of the course in National Yang-Ming university, Taiwan.
resultsAmong the regular cohort, poor pre-trained standardized patients (SPs) rated class climate, low grouped students satisfaction with the instructors and course, and low grouped student self-assessed readiness were noted in the cluster part than those in the core part. In comparison with regular cohort, greater improvement of post-cluster part end-of-course group objective structured clinical examination (GOSCE) scores was noted in intervention cohort. In other word, the implementation of Dreyfus scale-based feedback in the cluster part improved the deficit in this part of the course among the intervention cohort.
conclusionThe implementation of Dreyfus scale-based feedback helped instructors to create a good class climate in the cluster parts of clinical interviewing plus PE skills course in our study. Simultaneously, this new intervention achieved the goal of medical students competency in interviewing, PE and self-directed learning (SDL) skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.