Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31613904›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

The accumulation of deficits approach to describe frailty.

Raskit Lachmann, Marta Stelmach-Mardas, Manuela M Bergmann, Wolfgang Bernigau, Daniela Weber, Tobias Pischon, Heiner Boeing

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Longevity leap: mind the healthspan gap.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Raskit LachmannDepartment of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition, Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1098-1765
Marta Stelmach-MardasDepartment of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition, Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8929-5770
Manuela M BergmannDepartment of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition, Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Germany.
Wolfgang BernigauDepartment of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition, Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Germany.
Daniela WeberDepartment of Molecular Toxicology, German Institute of Human Nutrition, Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2054-6233
Tobias PischonMolecular Epidemiology Research Group, Max-Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin-Buch, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1568-767X
Heiner BoeingDepartment of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition, Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Germany.
German Institute of Human Nutrition · DEMax Delbrück Center · DEPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advancing age of the participants of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Potsdam study was the incentive to investigate frailty as a major parameter of ageing. The aim of this study was to develop a multidimensional tool to measure frailty in an ageing, free-living study population. The "accumulation of deficits approach" was used to develop a frailty index (FI) to characterize a sub-sample (N = 815) of the EPIC-Potsdam (EPIC-P) study population regarding the aging phenomenon. The EPIC-P frailty index (EPIC-P-FI) included 32 variables from the following domains: health, physical ability, psychosocial and physiological aspects. P-values were calculated for the linear trend between sociodemographic and life style variables and the EPIC-P-FI was calculated using regression analysis adjusted for age. The relationship between the EPIC-P-FI and age was investigated using fractional polynomials. Some characteristics such as age, education, time spent watching TV, cycling and a biomarker of inflammation (C-reactive protein) were associated with frailty in men and women. Interestingly, living alone, having no partner and smoking status were only associated with frailty in men, and alcohol use and physical fitness (VO2max) only in women. The generated, multidimensional FI, adapted to the EPIC-P study, showed that this cohort is a valuable source for further exploration of factors that promote healthy ageing.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID31613904
PMCPMC6793873
OpenAlexW2980732029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.