Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31613872›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2019

An ecosystem-wide reproductive failure with more snow in the Arctic.

Niels Martin Schmidt, Jeroen Reneerkens, Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen, Martin Olesen, Tomas Roslin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sequential analysis of δRapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Niels Martin SchmidtDepartment of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4166-6218
Jeroen ReneerkensGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0674-8143
Jens Hesselbjerg ChristensenNiels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Martin OlesenDanish Meteorological Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7801-3950
Tomas RoslinDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2957-4791

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

2018: Arctic researchers have just witnessed another extreme summer-but in a new sense of the word. Although public interest has long been focused on general warming trends and trends towards a lower sea ice cover in the Arctic Ocean, this summer saw the realization of another predicted trend: that of increasing precipitation during the winter months and of increased year-to-year variability. In a well-studied ecosystem in Northeast Greenland, this resulted in the most complete reproductive failure encountered in the terrestrial ecosystem during more than two decades of monitoring: only a few animals and plants were able to reproduce because of abundant and late melting snow. These observations, we suggest, should open our eyes to potentially drastic consequences of predicted changes in both the mean and the variability of arctic climate.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeGenetic FitnessPlant DormancyAnimalsArctic RegionsBirdsEcosystemMammalsPlantsRainSeasons

Identifiers

PMID31613872
PMCPMC6793841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.