Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31613131›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychology2020

Working memory and information processing in ADHD: Evidence for directionality of effects.

Michael J Kofler, Elia F Soto, Whitney D Fosco, Lauren N Irwin, Erica L Wells, Dustin E Sarver

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Toward children's cognitive development from the perspective of neurolaw: implications ofPsychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael J KoflerDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-8604-3647
Elia F SotoDepartment of Psychology.
Whitney D FoscoCenter for Children and Families.
Lauren N IrwinDepartment of Psychology.
Erica L WellsDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-8315-5053
Dustin E SarverCenter for Advancement of Youth.
Families USA · USYouth Development · US

Funding

Evaluating the Feasibility of Central Executive Training for Children with ADHD- Administrative SupplementR34MH102499 · NIMH · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KOFLER, MICHAEL J · 2014 to 2016
$737k
NIH HHSNIMH NIH HHS R34 MH102499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveChildren with ADHD demonstrate impaired performance on a wide range of neuropsychological tests. It is unclear, however, whether ADHD is associated with many neurocognitive deficits or whether a small number of impairment(s) broadly influence test performance. The current study tests competing model predictions regarding two candidate causal mechanisms in ADHD: information processing speed and working memory.

methodA well-characterized sample of 86 children (

resultsBayesian mixed-model ANOVAs indicated that increasing working memory demands produced significant reductions in information processing speed (drift rate; BF₁₀ = 5.82 × 10⁹⁶). In contrast, experimentally reducing children's information processing speed did not significantly change their working memory performance (BF₁₀ = 1.31). ADHD status interacted with the working memory manipulation, such that the ADHD and non-ADHD groups showed equivalently high accuracy under the encoding-only conditions (BF₀₁ = 3.45) but differed significantly under high working memory conditions (encoding + recall; BF₁₀ = 19.58). Importantly, however, ADHD status failed to interact with (a) the working memory manipulation to differentially affect information processing speed and (b) the information processing speed manipulation to differentially affect working memory performance (all BF₀₁ > 4.25).

conclusionsThese findings indicate that top-down executive control exerts significant effects on children's ability to quickly process information, but that working memory deficits and slowed information processing speed appear to be relatively independent impairments in ADHD. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

AdolescentAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityBayes TheoremChildCognitionExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleMemory DisordersMemory, Short-TermMental RecallNeuropsychological TestsReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID31613131
PMCPMC6987009
OpenAlexW2980410200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.