Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31613023›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2020

Ultrasound markers for prediction of complex gastroschisis and adverse outcome: longitudinal prospective nationwide cohort study.

C C M M Lap, L R Pistorius, E J H Mulder, M Aliasi, W L M Kramer, C M Bilardo, T E Cohen-Overbeek, E Pajkrt, D Tibboel, R M H Wijnen and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07030309 (MEGA STUDY - Multicenter Evaluation of Gastroschisis Anomaly Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07030309 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

MEGA STUDY - Multicenter Evaluation of Gastroschisis Anomaly Study

TypeobservationalSponsorResearchSkillsRan2025 to 2026Enrolled200ConditionsGastroschisisArmsGastroschisis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Prenatal ultrasound markers for prediction of complex gastroschisis-single-center retrospective cohort study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Abdominal wall defects.Translational pediatrics · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

C C M M LapDepartment of Obstetrics, Division Woman and Baby, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8226-9000
L R PistoriusDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
E J H MulderDepartment of Obstetrics, Division Woman and Baby, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M AliasiDepartment of Obstetrics, Division Woman and Baby, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
W L M KramerDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
C M BilardoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1894-0626
T E Cohen-OverbeekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
E PajkrtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
D TibboelDepartment of Pediatric Surgery and Intensive Care Children, Erasmus Medical Center, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
R M H WijnenDepartment of Pediatric Surgery and Intensive Care Children, Erasmus Medical Center, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
G H A VisserDepartment of Obstetrics, Division Woman and Baby, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
G T R MantenDepartment of Obstetrics, Division Woman and Baby, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
FLAMINGO Study Working Group
Utrecht University · NLErasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLStellenbosch University · ZAUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify antenatal ultrasound markers that can differentiate between simple and complex gastroschisis and assess their predictive value.

methodsThis was a prospective nationwide study of pregnancies with isolated fetal gastroschisis that underwent serial longitudinal ultrasound examination at regular specified intervals between 20 and 37 weeks' gestation. The primary outcome was simple or complex (i.e. involving bowel atresia, volvulus, perforation or necrosis) gastroschisis at birth. Fetal biometry (abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight), the occurrence of polyhydramnios, intra- and extra-abdominal bowel diameters and the pulsatility index (PI) of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) were assessed. Linear mixed modeling was used to compare the individual trajectories of cases with simple and those with complex gastroschisis, and logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the strength of association between the ultrasound parameters and outcome.

resultsOf 104 pregnancies with isolated fetal gastroschisis included, four ended in intrauterine death. Eighty-one (81%) liveborn infants with simple and 19 (19%) with complex gastroschisis were included in the analysis. We found no relationship between fetal biometric variables and complex gastroschisis. The SMA-PI was significantly lower in fetuses with gastroschisis than in healthy controls, but did not differentiate between simple and complex gastroschisis. Both intra- and extra-abdominal bowel diameters were larger in cases with complex, compared to those with simple, gastroschisis (P < 0.001 and P < 0.005, respectively). The presence of intra-abdominal bowel diameter ≥ 97.7

conclusionsThis large prospective longitudinal study found that intra-abdominal bowel dilatation when present repeatedly during fetal development can differentiate between simple and complex gastroschisis; however, the positive predictive value is low, and therefore the clinical usefulness of this marker is limited. © 2019 Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

AbdomenBiomarkersBiometryDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleFetal DeathFetusGastroschisisGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornIntestinesLinear ModelsLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMesenteric Artery, SuperiorBiomarkersbowelgastroschisisintra-abdominal bowel diametermesenteric arteryultrasound

Identifiers

PMID31613023
PMCPMC7318303
OpenAlexW2756307463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.