Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31612909›Full record

Trial reportJapanese journal of clinical oncology2019

Subgroup analysis of Japanese patients in a Phase 3 study of atezolizumab in advanced triple-negative breast cancer (IMpassion130).

Hiroji Iwata, Kenichi Inoue, Koji Kaneko, Yoshinori Ito, Koichiro Tsugawa, Ayumi Hasegawa, Shintaro Nakagawa, Hiroyasu Kuratomi, Kenji Tamura

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. PD-L1: expression regulation.Blood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroji IwataDepartment of Breast Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center, Aichi, Japan.
Kenichi InoueDivision of Breast Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
Koji KanekoDepartment of Breast Oncology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Yoshinori ItoBreast Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Koichiro TsugawaDivision of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, St Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Ayumi HasegawaChugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan, and.
Shintaro NakagawaChugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan, and.
Hiroyasu KuratomiChugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan, and.
Kenji TamuraDepartment of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Aichi Cancer Center · JPNiigata Cancer Center Hospital · JPSaitama Cancer Center · JPSt. Marianna University School of Medicine · JPThe Cancer Institute Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the randomised Phase 3 IMpassion130 trial, atezolizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel (atezo + nab-P) in 902 patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) showed prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in both the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive subgroup compared with placebo plus nab-P (plac + nab-P). This study assessed the efficacy and safety of atezo + nab-P in the IMpassion130 Japanese subpopulation.

methodsEligible patients had unresectable locally advanced or metastatic TNBC previously untreated with chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Patients were randomised 1:1 to receive either atezo + nab-P or plac + nab-P. Co-primary endpoints were investigator-assessed PFS and overall survival (ITT population and PD-L1-positive subgroup). These were also assessed in the Japanese subpopulation.

resultsThere were 65 Japanese patients (34 atezo + nab-P; 31 plac + nab-P). The PD-L1-positive subgroup included 25 patients (12 atezo + nab-P; 13 plac + nab-P). Median PFS was 7.4 months (atezo + nab-P) versus 4.6 months (plac + nab-P; hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25-0.90). In the PD-L1-positive subgroup, median PFS was 10.8 months (atezo + nab-P) versus 3.8 months (plac + nab-P; HR, 0.04; 95% CI, <0.01-0.35). Safety results in the Japanese subgroup were consistent with those in the overall population. The Japanese subgroup had a lower incidence of adverse events leading to treatment withdrawal than the overall population. More patients in the atezo + nab-P arm had neutrophil count decreases and stomatitis than patients in the plac + nab-P arm.

conclusionsAtezo + nab-P efficacy in Japanese patients was consistent with the overall IMpassion130 population. No new safety signals were observed, and tolerability was consistent with that of the overall population.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlbuminsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsB7-H1 AntigenFemaleHumansJapanMiddle AgedPaclitaxelProgression-Free SurvivalSafetyTriple Negative Breast Neoplasms130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxelAlbuminsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedatezolizumabB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanPaclitaxelatezolizumabimmunotherapyJapaneseprogrammed death-ligand 1triple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID31612909
PMCPMC6935297
OpenAlexW2980868069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.