Trial reportJapanese journal of clinical oncology2019
Subgroup analysis of Japanese patients in a Phase 3 study of atezolizumab in advanced triple-negative breast cancer (IMpassion130).
Trial report in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for Asian patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer: a phase III RCTs based meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Combined atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in the treatment of triple negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis on their efficacy and safety.BMC cancer · 2022Pooled it
- Treatment-Related Serious Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with triple-negative breast cancer: Results from KEYNOTE-355.Cancer medicine · 2023Trial
- Adjuvant atezolizumab in Japanese patients with resected stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (IMpower010).Cancer science · 2022Trial
- Subgroup analysis of Japanese patients in a phase III randomized, controlled study of neoadjuvant atezolizumab or placebo, combined with nab-paclitaxel and anthracycline-based chemotherapy in early triple-negative breast cancer (IMpassion031).Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2022Trial
- Efficacy of nab-paclitaxel combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Tumor-intrinsic metabolic pathways essential for tumorigenesis and resistance to anti-PD1 in oncogenic Kras-driven lung adenocarcinoma.Cancer & metabolism · 2026Article
- Next-Generation Immune Checkpoints and Tumor Microenvironment Modulation in Cancer Immunotherapy.Journal of immunology research · 2026Review
- Risk of severe infections in patients with triple-negative breast cancer treated with atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel: a real-world, postmarketing database study in Japan.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- Targeting tumour-infiltrating B cells: mechanisms and advances in cancer therapy.Cell death & disease · 2025Review
- Development of Multifunctional Targeted Dual-Loaded Polymeric Nanoparticles for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treatment.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Results from the randomized KEYNOTE-355 study of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for Asian patients with advanced TNBC.NPJ breast cancer · 2024Article
- Role of tumor cell pyroptosis in anti-tumor immunotherapy.Cell insight · 2024Review
- Review
- PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor - Related Adverse Events and Their Management in Breast Cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2024Review
- Article
- PD-L1: expression regulation.Blood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the randomised Phase 3 IMpassion130 trial, atezolizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel (atezo + nab-P) in 902 patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) showed prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in both the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive subgroup compared with placebo plus nab-P (plac + nab-P). This study assessed the efficacy and safety of atezo + nab-P in the IMpassion130 Japanese subpopulation.
methodsEligible patients had unresectable locally advanced or metastatic TNBC previously untreated with chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Patients were randomised 1:1 to receive either atezo + nab-P or plac + nab-P. Co-primary endpoints were investigator-assessed PFS and overall survival (ITT population and PD-L1-positive subgroup). These were also assessed in the Japanese subpopulation.
resultsThere were 65 Japanese patients (34 atezo + nab-P; 31 plac + nab-P). The PD-L1-positive subgroup included 25 patients (12 atezo + nab-P; 13 plac + nab-P). Median PFS was 7.4 months (atezo + nab-P) versus 4.6 months (plac + nab-P; hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25-0.90). In the PD-L1-positive subgroup, median PFS was 10.8 months (atezo + nab-P) versus 3.8 months (plac + nab-P; HR, 0.04; 95% CI, <0.01-0.35). Safety results in the Japanese subgroup were consistent with those in the overall population. The Japanese subgroup had a lower incidence of adverse events leading to treatment withdrawal than the overall population. More patients in the atezo + nab-P arm had neutrophil count decreases and stomatitis than patients in the plac + nab-P arm.
conclusionsAtezo + nab-P efficacy in Japanese patients was consistent with the overall IMpassion130 population. No new safety signals were observed, and tolerability was consistent with that of the overall population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.