ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2019
CD35 and CD64 of Neutrophils Can Differentiate Between Bacterial and Viral Infections in Children by Simultaneous Quantitative Analysis.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- High expression of neutrophil and monocyte CD64 with simultaneous lack of upregulation of adhesion receptors CD11b, CD162, CD15, CD65 on neutrophils in severe COVID-19.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the expression of CD35 and CD64 from white blood cells (neutrophil, monocytes, and lymphocytes) and acute infectious diseases in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS The blood samples were collected from 104 children with infections (42 viral infections and 62 bacterial infections). Blood samples were stained with CD45-PC5, CD35-FITC, and CD64-PE, and the fluorescence intensities were measured by flow cytometer, and then the ratio of CD35 to CD64 was calculated. RESULTS The ratio of CD64/CD35 on neutrophils (NCD35/NCD64) was significantly different between the bacterial group, the virus group, and the healthy control group. According to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, a cutoff value of 7.256 (sensitivity: 90.0%, specificity: 93.7%) was determined for the NCD35/NCD64 ratio. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that NCD35/NCD64 is helpful in the differential diagnosis of acute viral infection and bacterial infection in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.