Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31612432›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2020

Chemical and biological dispersants differently affect the bacterial communities of uncontaminated and oil-contaminated marine water.

Camila Rattes de Almeida Couto, Deborah Catharine de Assis Leite, Diogo Jurelevicius, Jan Dirk van Elsas, Lucy Seldin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Camila Rattes de Almeida CoutoInstituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Deborah Catharine de Assis LeiteInstituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Diogo JureleviciusInstituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Jan Dirk van ElsasMicrobial Ecology Department, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Lucy SeldinInstituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. lseldin@micro.ufrj.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4992-6395
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 01Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro -
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of dispersants in marine environments is a common practice worldwide for oil spill remediation. While the effects of chemical dispersants have been extensively studied, those of biosurfactants, mainly surfactin that is considered one of the most effective surfactants produced by bacteria, have been less considered. We constructed microcosms containing marine water collected from Grumari beach (W_GB, Brazil) and from Schiermonnikoog beach (W_SI, The Netherlands) with the addition of oil (WO), Ultrasperse II plus oil (WOS), surfactin plus oil (WOB), and both dispersants (WS or WB) individually. In these treatments, the composition of bacterial communities and their predictive biodegradation potential were determined over time. High-throughput sequencing of the rrs gene encoding bacterial 16S rRNA revealed that Bacteroidetes (Flavobacteria class) and Proteobacteria (mainly Gammaproteobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria classes) were the most abundant phyla found among the W_GB and W_SI microbiomes, and the relative abundance of the bacterial types in the different microcosms varied based on the treatment applied. Non-metrical multidimensional scaling (NMDS) revealed a clear clustering based on the addition of oil and on the dispersant type added to the GB or SI microcosms, i.e., WB and WOB were separated from WS and WOS in both marine ecosystems studied. The potential presence of diverse enzymes involved in oil degradation was indicated by predictive bacterial metagenome reconstruction. The abundance of predicted genes for degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons increased more in surfactin-treated microcosms than those treated with Ultrasperse II, mainly in the marine water samples from Grumari beach.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaWater MicrobiologyBacteriaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBrazilMetagenomePetroleumPetroleum PollutionSeawaterSurface-Active AgentsWater Pollutants, ChemicalPetroleumSurface-Active AgentsWater Pollutants, ChemicalBacterial communityBiosurfactantDispersantsMarine waterOil

Identifiers

PMID31612432
PMCPMC7203333
OpenAlexW2981119932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.