SynthesisCurrent medical science2019
Tamsulosin Monotherapy Is Effective in Reducing Ureteral Stent-related Symptoms: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.
Synthesis in Current medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ureteral stent symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the use of mirabegron and tamsulosin.BJUI compass · 2025Review
- Comparative Approaches in Treating Double-J Stent Syndrome: Monotherapy or Combination Therapy?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Pharmacological treatment of bladder stent symptoms.Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of tamsulosin monotherapy for the treatment of ureteral stent-related symptoms (SRSs) and compare it with that of solifenacin monotherapy and combined therapy of tamsulosin and silifenacin. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which evaluated the effectiveness of tamsulosin for the treatment of SRSs, were searched from the databases PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library published up to November 2018. Eight RCTs involving 1087 participants were finally included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that tamsulosin monotherapy could significantly decrease the urinary symptoms [mean difference (MD) -7.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-11.47, -3.65), P=0.0001] and body pain [MD -5.25, 95% CI (-8.03, -2.46), P=0.0002], and improve the sexual performance [MD -1.06, 95% CI (-1.89, -0.24), P=0.01] compared with the control group. Moreover, there was no significant difference between tamsulosin monotherapy and solifenacin monotherapy in all outcomes except for significantly better sexual performance in solifenacin group [MD 0.29, 95% CI (0.06, 0.51), P=0.01]. In addition, the effectiveness of combined therapy of tamsulosin and solifenacin was not superior to that of tamsulosin monotherapy. Our study demonstrated that tamsulosin monotherapy was effective for the treatment of patients with SRSs; evident superiority could not be found for therapy of tamsulosin and solifenacin combined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.