Trial reportAdvances in therapy2019
Analgesic Efficacy, Practicality and Safety of Inhaled Methoxyflurane Versus Standard Analgesic Treatment for Acute Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: A Randomised, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Multicentre Trial in Italy (MEDITA).
Trial report in Advances in therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety of Methoxyflurane Vaporized (PENTHROX®) in the Treatment of Acute Trauma Pain in Pre-hospital Setting and in the Emergency Department in Italy: a Multicentre, Randomized, Controlled, Open-label Study
A Randomized Multicentre Placebo Controlled Non-inferiority Study of Intravenous Sedation Versus Methoxyflurane During Hysteroscopy.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Approaching acute pain in emergency settings; European Society for Emergency Medicine (EUSEM) guidelines-part 2: management and recommendations.Internal and emergency medicine · 2020Guideline
- Analgesic effectiveness of methoxyflurane inhaler during genicular nerve block in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.Regional anesthesia and pain medicine · 2025Trial
- Evaluation of the effectiveness and costs of inhaled methoxyflurane versus usual analgesia for prehospital injury and trauma: non-randomised clinical study.BMC emergency medicine · 2022Trial
- Determination of equi-analgesic doses of inhaled methoxyflurane versus intravenous fentanyl using the cold pressor test in volunteers: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover study.British journal of anaesthesia · 2021Trial
- Inhaled Methoxyflurane in Australian Emergency Departments-A Cost-Minimisation Analysis.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2026Article
- Analgesic efficacy of inhaled methoxyflurane during transforaminal epidural steroid injection for lumbar radiculopathy: a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial.Asian spine journal · 2026Article
- The assessment and management of acute trauma pain in a Cape Town, South Africa Emergency Centre: A retrospective chart review.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026Article
- MetoksyKval: the extent of pre-hospital methoxyflurane administration for acute traumatic pain: focus on economic impact and rationale for use.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- Parenteral, Non-Intravenous Analgesia in Acute Traumatic Pain-A Narrative Review Based on a Systematic Literature Search.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Real world safety of methoxyflurane analgesia in the emergency setting: a comparative hybrid prospective-retrospective post-authorisation safety study.BMC emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Pain Self-Management with Inhaled Methoxyflurane by Emergency Department Trauma Patients: A Prospective, Interventional, Single-Center Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- The Pain Management of Trauma Patients in the Emergency Department.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Implementation of continuous temperature monitoring during perioperative care: a feasibility study.Patient safety in surgery · 2022Article
- [Volatile anesthetics for prehospital analgesia by paramedics-An overview].Der Anaesthesist · 2022Review
- Usability and effectiveness of inhaled methoxyflurane for prehospital analgesia - a prospective, observational study.BMC emergency medicine · 2022Observational
- Methoxyflurane in Non-Life-Threatening Traumatic Pain-A Retrospective Observational Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Does Inhaled Methoxyflurane Implement Fast and Efficient Pain Management in Trauma Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pain and therapy · 2021Article
- Inhaled methoxyflurane (Penthrox) for analgesia in trauma: a systematic review protocol.Systematic reviews · 2021Article
- Anaesthetic considerations in polytrauma patients.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2021Article
- The Anti-Inflammation and Anti-Nociception Effect of Ketoprofen in Rats Could Be Strengthened Through Co-Delivery of a HJournal of inflammation research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInhaled low-dose methoxyflurane is approved in Europe for emergency relief of moderate-to-severe trauma-related pain in adults, but data versus active comparators are sparse. The phase IIIb Methoxyflurane in Emergency Department in ITAly (MEDITA) trial investigated the analgesic efficacy, practicality and safety of methoxyflurane versus standard analgesic treatment (SAT) for acute trauma pain.
methodsThis was a randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label trial conducted in 15 Italian emergency units. Adults with limb trauma and pain score ≥ 4 on numerical rating scale (NRS) were randomised 1:1 to inhaled methoxyflurane 3 mL or SAT [intravenously administered (IV) morphine 0.1 mg/kg for severe pain (NRS ≥ 7); IV paracetamol 1 g or IV ketoprofen 100 mg for moderate pain (NRS 4-6)]. The primary endpoint was overall change in visual analogue scale (VAS) pain intensity from baseline (time of randomisation) to 3, 5 and 10 min. Non-inferiority and superiority of methoxyflurane versus SAT were concluded if the upper 95% confidence interval (CI) for the treatment comparison (methoxyflurane-SAT) was less than 1 and less than 0, respectively.
resultsBetween 8 February 2018 and 8 February 2019, 272 patients were randomised (136 per treatment group). A total of 270 patients (mean age 51 years; 49% male; 34% with severe pain; mean baseline VAS 67 mm) were treated and analysed for efficacy and safety. Superiority of methoxyflurane was demonstrated for moderate-to-severe pain (adjusted mean treatment difference - 5.94 mm; 95% CI - 8.83, - 3.06 mm), moderate pain (- 5.97 mm; 95% CI - 9.55, - 2.39 mm) and severe pain (- 5.54 mm; 95% CI - 10.49, - 0.59 mm). Median onset of pain relief was 9 min for methoxyflurane and 15 min for SAT. Practicality of methoxyflurane treatment was rated "Excellent", "Very Good" or "Good" by 90% of clinicians vs. 64% for SAT. Adverse events (all non-serious) were reported by 17% of methoxyflurane-treated patients and 3% of SAT-treated patients.
conclusionMethoxyflurane provided superior pain relief to SAT in patients with moderate-to-severe trauma pain and may offer a simple, fast, effective non-opioid treatment option.
trial registrationTrial registered with EudraCT (2017-001565-25) on 2 March 2018 and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03585374) on 13 July 2018.
fundingMundipharma Pharmaceuticals S.r.l.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.