Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31612359›Full record

Trial reportAdvances in therapy2019

Analgesic Efficacy, Practicality and Safety of Inhaled Methoxyflurane Versus Standard Analgesic Treatment for Acute Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: A Randomised, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Multicentre Trial in Italy (MEDITA).

Sebastiano Mercadante, Antonio Voza, Sossio Serra, Germana Ruggiano, Giuseppe Carpinteri, Gianfilippo Gangitano, Fabio Intelligente, Elisabetta Bonafede, Antonella Sblendido, Alberto Farina and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Advances in therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03585374 phase3completednot on this map

Efficacy and Safety of Methoxyflurane Vaporized (PENTHROX®) in the Treatment of Acute Trauma Pain in Pre-hospital Setting and in the Emergency Department in Italy: a Multicentre, Randomized, Controlled, Open-label Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMundipharma Pharmaceuticals srlRan2018 to 2019Enrolled272ConditionsAcute Traumatic PainArmsMethoxyflurane and Penthrox inhaler, Morphine, Paracetamol, Ketoprofen
NCT06899724 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Multicentre Placebo Controlled Non-inferiority Study of Intravenous Sedation Versus Methoxyflurane During Hysteroscopy.

TypeinterventionalSponsorDr. John A. Thiel Medical Professional CorporationRan2025 to 2026Enrolled54ConditionsAnalgesiaArmsAnesthetics, Inhalation, Intravenous Sedatives with or Without Analgesia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The assessment and management of acute trauma pain in a Cape Town, South Africa Emergency Centre: A retrospective chart review.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Anaesthetic considerations in polytrauma patients.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastiano MercadanteMain Regional Center for Pain Relief and Supportive/Palliative Care, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Palermo, Italy.
Antonio VozaEmergency Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Teaching Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Sossio SerraEmergency Department, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.
Germana RuggianoEmergency Medicine Department, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Giuseppe CarpinteriDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Policlinico G. Rodolico University Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Gianfilippo GangitanoEmergency Department, Infermi Hospital, Rimini, Italy.
Fabio IntelligenteEmergency Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Teaching Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Elisabetta BonafedeYGHEA, CRO Division of Ecol Studio Bioikos S.r.l., Bologna, Italy.
Antonella SblendidoMedical Affairs Department, Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals S.r.l., Milan, Italy.
Alberto FarinaMedical Affairs Department, Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals S.r.l., Milan, Italy.
Amedeo SoldiMedical Affairs Department, Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals S.r.l., Milan, Italy.
Andrea FabbriDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy. andrea.fabbri@auslromagna.it.
MEDITA Study Group
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITLa Maddalena · ITOspedale G.B. Morgagni - L.Pierantoni · ITOspedale Infermi di Rimini · ITOspedale “M. Bufalini” di Cesena · ITOspedale Santa Maria Annunziata · ITPoliclinico Universitario di Catania · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInhaled low-dose methoxyflurane is approved in Europe for emergency relief of moderate-to-severe trauma-related pain in adults, but data versus active comparators are sparse. The phase IIIb Methoxyflurane in Emergency Department in ITAly (MEDITA) trial investigated the analgesic efficacy, practicality and safety of methoxyflurane versus standard analgesic treatment (SAT) for acute trauma pain.

methodsThis was a randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label trial conducted in 15 Italian emergency units. Adults with limb trauma and pain score ≥ 4 on numerical rating scale (NRS) were randomised 1:1 to inhaled methoxyflurane 3 mL or SAT [intravenously administered (IV) morphine 0.1 mg/kg for severe pain (NRS ≥ 7); IV paracetamol 1 g or IV ketoprofen 100 mg for moderate pain (NRS 4-6)]. The primary endpoint was overall change in visual analogue scale (VAS) pain intensity from baseline (time of randomisation) to 3, 5 and 10 min. Non-inferiority and superiority of methoxyflurane versus SAT were concluded if the upper 95% confidence interval (CI) for the treatment comparison (methoxyflurane-SAT) was less than 1 and less than 0, respectively.

resultsBetween 8 February 2018 and 8 February 2019, 272 patients were randomised (136 per treatment group). A total of 270 patients (mean age 51 years; 49% male; 34% with severe pain; mean baseline VAS 67 mm) were treated and analysed for efficacy and safety. Superiority of methoxyflurane was demonstrated for moderate-to-severe pain (adjusted mean treatment difference - 5.94 mm; 95% CI - 8.83, - 3.06 mm), moderate pain (- 5.97 mm; 95% CI - 9.55, - 2.39 mm) and severe pain (- 5.54 mm; 95% CI - 10.49, - 0.59 mm). Median onset of pain relief was 9 min for methoxyflurane and 15 min for SAT. Practicality of methoxyflurane treatment was rated "Excellent", "Very Good" or "Good" by 90% of clinicians vs. 64% for SAT. Adverse events (all non-serious) were reported by 17% of methoxyflurane-treated patients and 3% of SAT-treated patients.

conclusionMethoxyflurane provided superior pain relief to SAT in patients with moderate-to-severe trauma pain and may offer a simple, fast, effective non-opioid treatment option.

trial registrationTrial registered with EudraCT (2017-001565-25) on 2 March 2018 and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03585374) on 13 July 2018.

fundingMundipharma Pharmaceuticals S.r.l.

Indexed as

AcetaminophenAcute PainAdministration, IntravenousAdultAnalgesicsAnesthetics, InhalationDose-Response Relationship, DrugEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansItalyMaleMethoxyfluraneMiddle AgedMorphinePain ManagementAcetaminophenAnalgesicsAnesthetics, InhalationMethoxyfluraneMorphineAcute painAnalgesicEmergency departmentMethoxyfluraneMorphineNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugParacetamolPenthroxPrehospitalTrauma

Identifiers

PMID31612359
PMCPMC6822789
OpenAlexW2981249950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.