Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31612279›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2019

[Advance care planning (ACP) in the context of dementia : Development of an instrument for exploration of perspectives of affected persons].

Henrike Voß, Andreas Kruse

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Henrike VoßNetzwerk für Alternsforschung (NAR), Universität Heidelberg, Bergheimer Str. 20, 69115, Heidelberg, Deutschland. voss@nar.uni-heidelberg.de.
Andreas KruseInstitut für Gerontologie, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince 2015, the Hospice and Palliative Care Act has defined the entitlement of nursing home residents to preventive planning in the final phase of their lives. Nevertheless, the advance care planning (ACP) concept has not yet been sufficiently researched in Germany. The deficient evidence on this topic appears to be even more considerable in connection with dementia. The necessity of such a discussion increases exponentially when dementia is diagnosed, not only for the person affected but also for their relatives and other caregivers and companions.

objectiveWith respect to people with dementia, documents by a prominent German ACP provider were assessed as being insufficient by the authors. The aim of the pilot study presented here was to modify a questionnaire (value anamnesis) frequently used in the national context in order to apply it to this vulnerable group. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe value anamnesis was modified in 11 steps and pre-tested on people with dementia in an early stage. The focus of the document is on attitudes towards life, death and life-prolonging measures. The modification process was carried out in an iterative process based on the grounded theory according to Strauss and Corbin. RESULTS AND

conclusionThe stepwise adaptation of the document has created a practicable and low-threshold approach that also enables the vulnerable group of people with dementia to comprehensively deal with existential issues and to exchange views on them. This catalogue of questions is used as a basis document for the subsequent main study: here the life attachment of people with dementia is explored and thus a new perspective is placed on ACP.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningSurveys and QuestionnairesCaregiversDementiaGermanyHumansPilot ProjectsAdaptationAdvance care planningAttitudesLow thresholdQuestionnaires

Identifiers

PMID31612279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.