ArticleEuropean radiology2020
Learning curve of liver stiffness measurement using a new hybrid machine composed of transient elastography interfaced with ultrasound.
Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intra-Observer Reproducibility of Endoscopic Ultrasound Point Shear-Wave Elastography: A 120-Patient Prospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Trends of Liver Stiffness in Inflammatory Bowel Disease with Chronic Hepatitis C.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the learning curve for performing reliable liver stiffness measurements using a new hybrid machine composed of transient elastography (TE) interfaced with an ultrasound device for radiographers and radiologists with different levels of expertise in ultrasound imaging.
methodsTen novice operators who had never performed TE measurements were prospectively evaluated from April to October 2018: senior radiologists, young radiologists, fellows, radiographers, and residents, with different levels of experience in abdominal ultrasound imaging. All operators had a short theoretical training followed by a training session under supervision in three patients. Then, each operator had to perform TE in 50 consecutive patients with chronic liver disease, using beforehand ultrasound examination to select measurement area in the right liver lobe, and if needed, the XL probe. Percentages of failures and reliable measurements were compared.
resultsThe rates of failures of measurements, poorly reliable, reliable, and very reliable results, were of 4.2% (21/500), 2.4% (12/500), 47.6% (238/500), and 45.8% (229/500), respectively. The rates of reliable plus very reliable results were excellent, ranging from 91 to 96% among all the subgroups. The rates of very reliable, reliable, and unreliable results did not differ between operator subgroups and especially between junior radiologists, senior radiologists, and radiographers. No breaking point was observed in the interquartile range/median values over time.
conclusionTE interfaced with ultrasound in this hybrid machine presents no learning curve effect. After a short initial training session, a novice observer is able to perform high rates of reliable and very reliable TE measurements. KEY POINTS: • When performing liver stiffness measurements using a new hybrid machine composed of transient elastography interfaced with ultrasound, the rate of failures of measurements is very low, below 5%. • After a short training session and using ultrasound planning, a novice operator, whatever its expertise in ultrasound imaging, is capable of performing high rates of reliable and very reliable measurements. • No learning curve is needed for performing reliable liver stiffness measurements using this new hybrid machine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.