Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31612148›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes research2019

Risk Factors and Diagnosis of Diabetic Foot Ulceration in Users of the Brazilian Public Health System.

Hígor Chagas Cardoso, Ana Laura de Sene Amâncio Zara, Suélia de Siqueira Rodrigues Fleury Rosa, Gabriel Alves Rocha, João Victor Costa Rocha, Maria Clara Emos de Araújo, Pedro de Freitas Quinzani, Yaman Paula Barbosa, Fátima Mrué

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Polymers · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hígor Chagas CardosoPostgraduate Program of Health Sciences, Federal University of Góias, Goiânia, Goiás 75605-050, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2091-5334
Ana Laura de Sene Amâncio ZaraPostgraduate Program of Odontology, Federal University of Góias, Goiânia, Goiás 74605-220, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7012-9078
Suélia de Siqueira Rodrigues Fleury RosaPostgraduate Program of Biomedical Engineering (FGA), University of Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal 72444-240, Brazil.
Gabriel Alves RochaUndergraduate Program of Medicine, University Center of Anápolis Unievangélica, Anápolis, Goiás 75075-010, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8756-1887
João Victor Costa RochaUndergraduate Program of Medicine, University Center of Anápolis Unievangélica, Anápolis, Goiás 75075-010, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8657-7043
Maria Clara Emos de AraújoUndergraduate Program of Medicine, University Center of Anápolis Unievangélica, Anápolis, Goiás 75075-010, Brazil.
Pedro de Freitas QuinzaniUndergraduate Program of Medicine, University Center of Anápolis Unievangélica, Anápolis, Goiás 75075-010, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4927-550X
Yaman Paula BarbosaUndergraduate Program of Medicine, University Center of Anápolis Unievangélica, Anápolis, Goiás 75075-010, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7864-9510
Fátima MruéPostgraduate Program of Health Sciences, Federal University of Góias, Goiânia, Goiás 75605-050, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8824-3928
Universidade Evangelica de Goiás · BRUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn individual with diabetes mellitus (DM) has an approximately 25% risk of developing ulcerations and/or destruction of the feet's soft tissues. These wounds represent approximately 20% of all causes of hospitalizations due to DM.

objectiveTo identify the factors for the development of diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) among individuals treated by the Brazilian public health system.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted on individuals with diabetes mellitus, aged above 18 years, of both sexes, and during July-October 2018 within a public healthcare unit in Brazil. All participants were assessed based on their socioeconomic, behavioral, and clinical characteristics, along with vascular and neurological evaluations. All participants were also classified according to the classification of risk of developing DFU, in accordance with the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF). Statistical analyses were conducted using the chi-squared test, chi-squared test for trend, and Fisher's exact test, with a significance level of 5% (

resultsThe study consisted of 85 individuals. The DFU condition was prevalent in 10.6% of the participants. Adopting the classification proposed by IWGDF, observed risks for stratification categories 0, 1, 2, and 3 were 28.2%, 29.4%, 23.5%, and 8.2%, respectively. A statistically significant (

conclusionThe present study found an elevated predominance of DM patients in the Brazilian public health system (SUS) featuring cutaneous alterations that may lead to ulcers; these individuals had elevated risks of developing DFU. Furthermore, it was revealed that the feet of patients were not physically examined during treatment.

Indexed as

National Health ProgramsPublic HealthAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetic FootFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31612148
PMCPMC6755287
OpenAlexW2972172104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.