Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31612142›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2019

Modeling the Impact of Newcastle Disease Virus Vaccinations on Chicken Production Systems in Northeastern Madagascar.

Akshaya Annapragada, Cortni Borgerson, Sarah Iams, M Ando Ravelomanantsoa, Graham C Crawford, Marika Helin, Evelin Jean Gasta Anjaranirina, Hervet J Randriamady, Christopher D Golden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Akshaya AnnapragadaHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Cortni BorgersonDepartment of Anthropology, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ, United States.
Sarah IamsHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.
M Ando RavelomanantsoaDepartement Production et Partenariat, Institut Malgache des Vaccins Vétérinaires (IMVAVET), Ampandrianomby, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Graham C CrawfordWildlife Health Network, Sonoma, CA, United States.
Marika HelinMadagascar Health and Environmental Research (MAHERY), Maroantsetra, Madagascar.
Evelin Jean Gasta AnjaranirinaMadagascar Health and Environmental Research (MAHERY), Maroantsetra, Madagascar.
Hervet J RandriamadyMadagascar Health and Environmental Research (MAHERY), Maroantsetra, Madagascar.
Christopher D GoldenMadagascar Health and Environmental Research (MAHERY), Maroantsetra, Madagascar.
Institute Malgache De Recherches Appliquées · MGHarvard University · USHealth Net · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chickens are a key source of nutrition for rural Malagasy communities. Due to high endemic rates of Newcastle disease, it remains challenging to raise sustainable chicken flocks as a consistent food source. Here, we explore the impact of triannual Newcastle disease virus (NDV) vaccine interventions on the growth and herd immunity acquisition of Malagasy chicken flocks. Between 2011 and 2018 we collected longitudinal data to assess the population dynamics of chicken populations in remote Malagasy communities. In 2016, we launched a pilot campaign for vaccination in six rural communities to determine the impacts on chicken survivorship and productivity. We used these data to specify a mathematical model of realistic Malagasy chicken population dynamics under a triannual vaccination regime. The mathematical model represents an extension to conventional SIR models that allows for modeling the impact of specific vaccinations on chicken flock dynamics, rather than estimation of parameters. Understanding chicken population dynamics is important for realizing the potential for domestic chicken flocks to serve as sustainable food sources. The results suggested that vaccination coverage of at least ~40% is necessary over 5+ years to achieve population doubling, while complete herd immunity may not be possible given the short duration of effectiveness of vaccination, and the high levels of births and deaths in the chicken flocks.

Indexed as

animal-source foodsfood securitymalnutritionpoultrysustainable agriculturevaccination

Identifiers

PMID31612142
PMCPMC6775217
OpenAlexW2970877516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.