ArticleOncology letters2019
Prognostic and metastasis-related factors in colorectal neuroendocrine tumors: A cross-sectional study based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results.
Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epidemiological trends and novel prognostic evaluation approaches of patients with stage II-IV colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms: A population-based study with external validation.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Trial
- Recent research advances in interleukin, microRNA and neuroendocrine tumor biomarkers (Review).Molecular and clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Clinical and pathological characteristics of and predictive model for colorectal neuroendocrine tumors.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Article
- Tumor Differentiation is the Dominant Prognostic Factor for Patients with Colorectal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms with Distant Metastasis.International journal of endocrinology · 2022Article
- Risk and prognostic nomograms for colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasm with liver metastasis: a population-based study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of colorectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is gradually increasing with the increasing availability of colonoscopy and computed tomography. However, prognostic and metastatic factors for colorectal NETs are unknown. The aim of the present study was to identify clinicopathological prognostic and metastasis-related risk factors for colorectal NETs. Based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program, the data of 3,093 patients with colorectal NETs were included in the present study. χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.