Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31611878›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2019

Luciano Castiello, Eleonora Aricò, Giuseppina D'Agostino, Laura Santodonato, Filippo Belardelli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. mRNA vaccines as cancer therapies.Chinese medical journal · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Human CD141Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luciano CastielloFaBioCell, Core Facilities, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Eleonora AricòFaBioCell, Core Facilities, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppina D'AgostinoFaBioCell, Core Facilities, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Laura SantodonatoFaBioCell, Core Facilities, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Filippo BelardelliConsiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche, Institute of Translational Pharmacology, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For more than 25 years, dendritic cell (DC) based vaccination has flashily held promises to represent a therapeutic approach for cancer treatment. While the vast majority of studies has focused on the use of antigen loaded DC, the intratumoral delivery of unloaded DC aiming at

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigen PresentationCancer VaccinesDendritic CellsHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasmsVaccinationCancer Vaccinescancer immunotherapycheckpoint inhibitor combination therapydendritic cell (DC)in situ vaccinationintratumor administrationmonocyte derived dendritic cells (MoDC)

Identifiers

PMID31611878
PMCPMC6773832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.