Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31611705›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2019

Advancing functional connectivity research from association to causation.

Andrew T Reid, Drew B Headley, Ravi D Mill, Ruben Sanchez-Romero, Lucina Q Uddin, Daniele Marinazzo, Daniel J Lurie, Pedro A Valdés-Sosa, Stephen José Hanson, Bharat B Biswal and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 173 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
173citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

173 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Structure Guides Function: Beyond Pairwise Neural Interactions.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2026
    Review
  4. Temporal stability of functional network configurations and its relationship to cognition and psychopathology in early psychoses.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

113 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Andrew T ReidSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Drew B HeadleyCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA.
Ravi D MillCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA.
Ruben Sanchez-RomeroCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA.
Lucina Q UddinDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Daniele MarinazzoDepartment of Data Analysis, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Daniel J LurieDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Pedro A Valdés-SosaThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Stephen José HansonRUBIC & Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA.
Bharat B BiswalDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA.
Vince CalhounTri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS) [Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University], Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9058-0747
Russell A PoldrackDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6755-0259
Michael W ColeCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA. mwcole@mwcole.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4329-438X

Funding

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Auditory Verbal HalluciP20GM103472 · NIGMS · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI THOMA, ROBERT J · 2012 to 2017
$14.3M
Unified multivariate data-driven solutions for static and dynamic brain connectivityR01EB020407 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2015 to 2018
$2.7M
Cognitive and Neural Flexibility in AutismR01MH107549 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI CORAL GABLES · PI UDDIN, LUCINA QAZI · 2015 to 2019
$2.4M
Brain Network Mechanisms of Aging-Related Cognitive DeclineR01AG055556 · NIA · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI COLE, MICHAEL WILLIAM · 2017 to 2022
$2.3M
Brain Network Mechanisms of Instructed LearningR01MH109520 · NIMH · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI COLE, MICHAEL WILLIAM · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
Establishing relationships between functional connectivity and activity dynamicsF31NS108665 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI LURIE, DANIEL J · 2019 to 2020
$82k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG055556NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020407NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103472NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107549NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH109520NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS108665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognition and behavior emerge from brain network interactions, such that investigating causal interactions should be central to the study of brain function. Approaches that characterize statistical associations among neural time series-functional connectivity (FC) methods-are likely a good starting point for estimating brain network interactions. Yet only a subset of FC methods ('effective connectivity') is explicitly designed to infer causal interactions from statistical associations. Here we incorporate best practices from diverse areas of FC research to illustrate how FC methods can be refined to improve inferences about neural mechanisms, with properties of causal neural interactions as a common ontology to facilitate cumulative progress across FC approaches. We further demonstrate how the most common FC measures (correlation and coherence) reduce the set of likely causal models, facilitating causal inferences despite major limitations. Alternative FC measures are suggested to immediately start improving causal inferences beyond these common FC measures.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsBrainFunctional NeuroimagingHumansNeural PathwaysValidation Studies as Topic

Identifiers

PMID31611705
PMCPMC7289187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.