Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31611616›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2020

Neonatal and maternal outcomes of pregnancies with a fetal diagnosis of congenital heart disease using a standardized delivery room management protocol.

April D Adams, Nimisha Aggarwal, Melissa H Fries, Mary T Donofrio, Sara N Iqbal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

April D AdamsDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, D.C., USA. april.d.adams@medstar.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7776-2941
Nimisha AggarwalDivision of Cardiology, Children's National Health System, Washington, D.C., USA.
Melissa H FriesDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, D.C., USA.
Mary T Donofrio *Division of Cardiology, Children's National Health System, Washington, D.C., USA.
Sara N Iqbal *Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, D.C., USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe sought to determine if fetuses with prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease (CHD) were more likely to undergo cesarean delivery in the setting of a non-reassuring fetal heart rate tracing (NRFHT) and to determine if those fetuses were more likely to have a fetal acidosis. STUDY

designA retrospective cohort study of neonates prenatally diagnosed with CHD from August 2010 to July 2016. The control group consisted of gestational age matched controls without CHD.

resultsEach group consisted of 143 patients. The most common reason for cesarean delivery was a NRFHT (control 31% vs CHD 35%, p = 0.67). Fetal acidosis was a rare outcome occurring in only five controls (3.5%) and 11 cases (7.7%) (p = 0.12).

conclusionThese findings demonstrate that with multidisciplinary care coordination, fetuses with a prenatal diagnosis of CHD have similar cesarean rates, labor and delivery management, and delivery room compromise as healthy fetuses.

Indexed as

Heart Defects, CongenitalPrenatal DiagnosisCesarean SectionDelivery, ObstetricDelivery RoomsDistrict of ColumbiaFemaleFetal DiseasesGestational AgeHeart Rate, FetalHospitals, PediatricHumansInfant, NewbornMalePatient Care ManagementPregnancy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.