Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31611543›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2020

Demonstration of Human Fetal Bone Morphology with MR Imaging: A Preliminary Study.

Yoshiko Matsubara, Toru Higaki, Chihiro Tani, Shogo Kamioka, Kuniaki Harada, Hirohiko Aoyama, Yuko Nakamura, Tomoyuki Akita, Kazuo Awai

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genetic Disorders Detectable by Fetal MRI: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Automated Craniofacial Biometry with 3D T2w Fetal MRI.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging of lumbar spine development in vivo: a retrospective study.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yoshiko MatsubaraDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University.
Toru HigakiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University.
Chihiro TaniDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Hiroshima City Hospital.
Shogo KamiokaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Hiroshima University Hospital.
Kuniaki HaradaHealthcare Business Unit, Hitachi, Ltd.
Hirohiko AoyamaDepartment of Medical Science and Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hiroshima International University.
Yuko NakamuraDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University.
Tomoyuki AkitaDepartment of Epidemiology, Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University.
Kazuo AwaiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCT is a useful modality for the evaluation of fetal skeletal dysplasia but radiation exposure is unavoidable. The purpose of this study is to compare the usefulness of MRI and CT for evaluating the fetal skeletal shape.

methodsThis study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. Fetal specimens (n = 14) were scanned on a 3T MRI scanner using our newly-developed sequence. It is based on T

resultsThe diagnostic ability of MRI with respect to the 5th metacarpals, femur, fibula, and pelvis was superior to CT (all, P < 0.050); there was no significant difference in the evaluation results of observers with respect to the cervical and lumbar spine, and the 5th metatarsal (0.058 ≤ P ≤ 1.000). However, the diagnostic ability of MRI was significantly inferior to CT for the assessment of the bone shape of the thoracic spine (observers A and C: P = 0.002, observers B and D: P = 0.001).

conclusionThe MRI method we developed represents a potential alternative to CT imaging for the evaluation of the fetal bone structure.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingBone and BonesBone Diseases, DevelopmentalFemaleFetusHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalLumbar VertebraeMaleObserver VariationTomography, X-Ray Computedbone diseasesfetal specimenmagnetic resonance imagingprenatal diagnosisradiation exposure

Identifiers

PMID31611543
PMCPMC7809137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.