Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31611410›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Myelin sheath structure and regeneration in peripheral nerve injury repair.

Bin Liu, Wang Xin, Jian-Rong Tan, Rui-Ping Zhu, Ting Li, Dan Wang, Sha-Sha Kan, Ding-Kui Xiong, Huan-Huan Li, Meng-Meng Zhang and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bin LiuKey Laboratory of Freshwater Fish Reproduction and Development, Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, 400715 Chongqing, China; xytom@swu.edu.cn chanzhoum@163.com wangzj@swu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-1163-9371
Wang XinKey Laboratory of Freshwater Fish Reproduction and Development, Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, 400715 Chongqing, China.
Jian-Rong TanKey Laboratory of Freshwater Fish Reproduction and Development, Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, 400715 Chongqing, China.
Rui-Ping ZhuKey Laboratory of Freshwater Fish Reproduction and Development, Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, 400715 Chongqing, China.
Ting LiKey Laboratory of Freshwater Fish Reproduction and Development, Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, 400715 Chongqing, China.
Dan WangKey Laboratory of Freshwater Fish Reproduction and Development, Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, 400715 Chongqing, China.
Sha-Sha KanKey Laboratory of Freshwater Fish Reproduction and Development, Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, 400715 Chongqing, China.
Ding-Kui XiongInstitute for Silk and Related Biomaterials Research, Chongqing Academy of Animal Science, 402460 Chongqing, China.
Huan-Huan LiKey Laboratory of Freshwater Fish Reproduction and Development, Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, 400715 Chongqing, China.
Meng-Meng ZhangKey Laboratory of Freshwater Fish Reproduction and Development, Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, 400715 Chongqing, China.
Huan-Huan SunKey Laboratory of Freshwater Fish Reproduction and Development, Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, 400715 Chongqing, China.
William WagstaffMolecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637.
Chan ZhouInstitute for Silk and Related Biomaterials Research, Chongqing Academy of Animal Science, 402460 Chongqing, China xytom@swu.edu.cn chanzhoum@163.com wangzj@swu.edu.cn.
Zhi-Jian WangKey Laboratory of Freshwater Fish Reproduction and Development, Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, 400715 Chongqing, China; xytom@swu.edu.cn chanzhoum@163.com wangzj@swu.edu.cn.
Yao-Guang ZhangKey Laboratory of Freshwater Fish Reproduction and Development, Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, 400715 Chongqing, China.
Tong-Chuan HeMolecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637.
Southwest University · CNChongqing Academy of Animal Science · CNUniversity of Chicago Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observing the structure and regeneration of the myelin sheath in peripheral nerves following injury and during repair would help in understanding the pathogenesis and treatment of neurological diseases caused by an abnormal myelin sheath. In the present study, transmission electron microscopy, immunofluorescence staining, and transcriptome analyses were used to investigate the structure and regeneration of the myelin sheath after end-to-end anastomosis, autologous nerve transplantation, and nerve tube transplantation in a rat model of sciatic nerve injury, with normal optic nerve, oculomotor nerve, sciatic nerve, and Schwann cells used as controls. The results suggested that the double-bilayer was the structural unit that constituted the myelin sheath. The major feature during regeneration was the compaction of the myelin sheath, wherein the distance between the 2 layers of cell membrane in the double-bilayer became shorter and the adjacent double-bilayers tightly closed together and formed the major dense line. The expression level of myelin basic protein was positively correlated with the formation of the major dense line, and the compacted myelin sheath could not be formed without the anchoring of the lipophilin particles to the myelin sheath.

Indexed as

Nerve RegenerationAnimalsAxonsMyelin SheathPeripheral Nerve InjuriesRatsanchoring particlelipophilinmajor dense line (MDL)myelin basic protein (MBP)myelin sheath

Identifiers

PMID31611410
PMCPMC6825268
OpenAlexW2980476738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.