Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31611370›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Evolution of sexual cooperation from sexual conflict.

Maria R Servedio, John M Powers, Russell Lande, Trevor D Price

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Coevolution of longevity and female germline maintenance.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The evolution of sex peptide: sexual conflict, cooperation, and coevolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Eusociality through conflict dissolution.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Male mating displays can evolve from exploitative origins to cooperative endings.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria R ServedioDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
John M PowersDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
Russell LandeCenter for Biodiversity Dynamics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Trevor D PriceDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 pricet@uchicago.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4423-8999

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many species that form pair bonds, males display to their mate after pair formation. These displays elevate the female's investment into the brood. This is a form of cooperation because without the display, female investment is reduced to levels that are suboptimal for both sexes. The presence of such displays is paradoxical as in their absence the male should be able to invest extra resources directly into offspring, to the benefit of both sexes. We consider that the origin of these displays lies in the exploitation of preexisting perceptual biases which increase female investment beyond that which is optimal for her, initially resulting in a sexual conflict. We use a combined population genetic and quantitative genetic model to show how this conflict becomes resolved into sexual cooperation. A cooperative outcome is most likely when perceptual biases are under selection pressures in other contexts (e.g., detection of predators, prey, or conspecifics), but this is not required. Cooperation between pair members can regularly evolve even when this provides no net advantage to the pair and when the display itself reduces a male's contributions to raising the brood. The findings account for many interactions between the sexes that have been difficult to explain in the context of sexual selection.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionModels, GeneticSelection, GeneticSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsClutch SizeFemaleFertilityMalecooperationdifferential allocationsensory biassexual conflictsexual stimulation

Identifiers

PMID31611370
PMCPMC6859360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.