Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31611298›Full record

ArticleGut2020

Scientific frontiers in faecal microbiota transplantation: joint document of Asia-Pacific Association of Gastroenterology (APAGE) and Asia-Pacific Society for Digestive Endoscopy (APSDE).

Siew C Ng, Michael A Kamm, Yun Kit Yeoh, Paul K S Chan, Tao Zuo, Whitney Tang, Ajit Sood, Akira Andoh, Naoki Ohmiya, Yongjian Zhou and 6 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 74 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04251767 nawithdrawnnot on this map

Washed Microbiota Transplantation for Patients With 2019-nCoV Infection: a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Second Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityRan2020 to 2020Enrolled0ConditionsCOVID-19 Complicated With Refractory Intestinal InfectionsArmswashed microbiota transplantation, placebo
NCT06106698 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Washed Microbiota Transplantation for Clostridioides Difficile Infection: a Real World Research

TypeobservationalSponsorThe Second Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityRan2023 to 2029Enrolled100ConditionsClostridioides Difficile InfectionArmsWMT
NCT06836427 early_phase1not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

CMTS0929 for Clostridioides Difficile Infection: a Prospective, Open-label, Single-arm Clinical Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Second Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityRan2025 to 2030Enrolled12ConditionsClostridioides Difficile InfectionArmsCMTS0929
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Expert consensus on the clinical application of gut microbiota transplant therapy in chronic liver disease (version 2025)].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025
    Article
  13. Roles of Gut Microbiota and Associated Metabolites inPolish journal of microbiology · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

Siew C NgCenter for Gut Microbiota Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China siewchienng@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID 0000-0002-6850-4454
Michael A KammSt Vincent's Hospital and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Yun Kit YeohCenter for Gut Microbiota Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0241-6117
Paul K S ChanCenter for Gut Microbiota Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Tao ZuoCenter for Gut Microbiota Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Whitney TangCenter for Gut Microbiota Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Ajit SoodGastroenterology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Akira AndohDepartment of Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.
Naoki OhmiyaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.
Yongjian ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Guangzhou Digestive Disease Center, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Choon Jin OoiGleneagles Medical Centre and Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Varocha MahachaiDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chun-Ying WuGraduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Faming ZhangMedical Center for Digestive Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Kentaro SuganoDepartment of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
Francis K L ChanCenter for Gut Microbiota Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7388-2436
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HKChina Medical University · TWChulalongkorn University · THDayanand Medical College & Hospital · INDuke-NUS Medical School · SGFujita Health University · JPGuangzhou First People's Hospital · CNJichi Medical University · JPShiga University of Medical Science · JPSir Run Run Shaw Hospital · CNThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe underlying microbial basis, predictors of therapeutic outcome and active constituent(s) of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) mediating benefit remain unknown. An international panel of experts presented key elements that will shape forthcoming FMT research and practice.

designSystematic search was performed, FMT literature was critically appraised and a 1-day round-table discussion was conducted to derive expert consensus on key issues in FMT research.

results16 experts convened and discussed five questions regarding (1) the role of donor and recipient microbial (bacteria, viruses, fungi) parameters in FMT; (2) methods to assess microbiota alterations; (3) concept of keystone species and microbial predictors of FMT, (4) influence of recipient profile and antibiotics pretreatment on FMT engraftment and maintenance and (5) new developments in FMT formulations and delivery. The panel considered that variable outcomes of FMT relate to compositional and functional differences in recipient's microbiota, and likely donor-associated and recipient-associated physiological and genetic factors. Taxonomic composition of donor intestinal microbiota may influence the efficacy of FMT in recurrent

conclusionFMT requires optimisation before their therapeutic promise can be evaluated for different diseases. This summary will guide future directions and priorities in advancement of the science and practice of FMT.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsClostridioides difficileEndoscopy, GastrointestinalEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousFecal Microbiota TransplantationFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesPrognosisRecurrenceTissue DonorsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial Agentsbacteriadonorfaecal microbiota transplantationfungirecipientvirus

Identifiers

PMID31611298
PMCPMC6943253
OpenAlexW2979304648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.