Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31611251›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of experimental medicine2020

Biology and therapeutic potential of interleukin-10.

Margarida Saraiva, Paulo Vieira, Anne O'Garra

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of experimental medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 626 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
626citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
24.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

626 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,040 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Comparative analysis ofPharmaceutical biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

566 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Margarida SaraivaInstituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Paulo VieiraDepartment of Immunology, Unité Lymphopoièse, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Anne O'GarraLaboratory of Immunoregulation and Infection, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Inserm · FRThe Francis Crick Institute · GBUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U117565642Wellcome Trust FC001126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cytokine IL-10 is a key anti-inflammatory mediator ensuring protection of a host from over-exuberant responses to pathogens and microbiota, while playing important roles in other settings as sterile wound healing, autoimmunity, cancer, and homeostasis. Here we discuss our current understanding of the regulation of IL-10 production and of the molecular pathways associated with IL-10 responses. In addition to IL-10's classic inhibitory effects on myeloid cells, we also describe the nonclassic roles attributed to this pleiotropic cytokine, including how IL-10 regulates basic processes of neural and adipose cells and how it promotes CD8 T cell activation, as well as epithelial repair. We further discuss its therapeutic potential in the context of different diseases and the outstanding questions that may help develop an effective application of IL-10 in diverse clinical settings.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutoimmunityCytokinesHumansInflammationInterleukin-10NeoplasmsCytokinesInterleukin-10

Identifiers

PMID31611251
PMCPMC7037253
OpenAlexW2981100201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.