Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31610803›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2019

Trends in canine seroprevalence to Borrelia burgdorferi and Anaplasma spp. in the eastern USA, 2010-2017.

Bhagya Galkissa Dewage, Susan Little, Mark Payton, Melissa Beall, Jennifer Braff, Donald Szlosek, Jesse Buch, Andrew Knupp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Human-BitingMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  6. Tick-Borne Pathogens,Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Rapid Discovery and Detection ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Epidemiological and Clinicopathological Features ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Review
  12. Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Regional and Local Temporal Trends ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bhagya Galkissa DewageDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Center for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA.
Susan LittleDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Center for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA. susan.little@okstate.edu.
Mark PaytonDepartment of Statistics, College of Arts and Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA.
Melissa BeallIDEXX Laboratories, Inc., Westbrook, Maine, USA.
Jennifer BraffIDEXX Laboratories, Inc., Westbrook, Maine, USA.
Donald SzlosekIDEXX Laboratories, Inc., Westbrook, Maine, USA.
Jesse BuchIDEXX Laboratories, Inc., Westbrook, Maine, USA.
Andrew KnuppIDEXX Laboratories, Inc., Westbrook, Maine, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBorrelia burgdorferi and Anaplasma phagocytophilum are tick-borne infections transmitted by Ixodes scapularis in the eastern USA; both agents cause disease in dogs and people. To characterize changes in seroprevalence over time, Cochran Armitage trend tests were used to evaluate percent positive test results for antibodies to B. burgdorferi and Anaplasma spp. in approximately 20 million canine tests from 2010-2017 in 25 states and 905 counties in the eastern USA.

resultsA significant decreasing trend in seroprevalence to B. burgdorferi was evident in eight states along the mid-Atlantic coast from Virginia to New Hampshire, and in Wisconsin. In contrast, a continued increasing trend was evident in five northeastern and Midwestern states where Lyme borreliosis is endemic or emerging, as well as in three southern states where endemicity has not yet been widely established. Similarly, seroprevalence to Anaplasma spp. showed a significant, although smaller, decreasing trend in five states along the mid-Atlantic coast from Virginia to Connecticut and Rhode Island, as well as in Minnesota and Wisconsin in the Midwest; despite the fact that those trends were significant they were weak. However, a strong increasing trend was evident in Massachusetts and three states in northern New England as well as in Pennsylvania.

conclusionsAs expected, seroprevalence continued to increase in regions where Lyme borreliosis and anaplasmosis are more newly endemic. However, the declining seroprevalence evident in other areas was not anticipated. Although the reasons for the decreasing trends are not clear, our finding may reflect shifting ecologic factors that have resulted in decreased infection risk or the combined positive influence of canine vaccination, tick control, and routine testing of dogs in regions where these infections have long been endemic. Analysis of trends in canine test results for tick-borne infections continues to be a valuable tool to understand relative geographical and temporal risk for these zoonotic agents.

Indexed as

AnaplasmaAnaplasma phagocytophilumAnaplasmosisAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBorrelia burgdorferiDog DiseasesDogsEhrlichiosisEndemic DiseasesLyme DiseaseSeroepidemiologic StudiesUnited StatesAntibodies, BacterialAnaplasma spp.AnaplasmosisBorrelia burgdorferiCanineEpidemiologyLyme borreliosisSNAP®4Dx® Plus Test

Identifiers

PMID31610803
PMCPMC6791011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.